Jump to content

teddybear

Bronze Member
  • Posts

    2,259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by teddybear

  1. The half that matters is. Same for nuclear missiles - those countries which matter have them. And no, they are not the richest countries. Just saying...
  2. Btw the math is idiotically simple. You check out how much fiat you transfered to the exchange and divide it by all XRP you have.
  3. Occasionally you'll see a "Hodler and lurker since 2016, just made my first post, wanted to say how fun this forum is" kind of post. Those are the big guys hahaha
  4. "Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer." I also believe that XRP is a very real threat to anything big - Central banks and correspondent banks. Small and decentralized is beautiful.
  5. You do not seriously expect anybody who accumulated before December 2017, let alone before January 2016 to publish this info, right?
  6. He is slowly realizing what it means to be on a lot of people's ignore list.
  7. @Zerp I have a simple solution for your "concerns" about market cap. So since at price X, the market cap would be too high for your taste, I suggest you sell before that magic number of yours and look for another asset where you still see room for growth in terms of market cap. I'll have a drink on you in my modest Swiss Chalet when I cash out at XRP/USD = $5'000
  8. He basically personally owned all of Egypt. Gib dir mal den Scheiss, Alter....
  9. Aha. And what stops Chris from accepting a tender offer for his stash of XRP?
  10. Your logic is so flawed, it already hurts. So, you don't agree with @Ripple-Stiltskin, but you present no argument against the irrelevance of market cap. Let me be clear and debunk your short-sighted thinking: Market capitalization is a function of price times supply. If the asset is to handle high $-volume transactions without causing too much volatility, then the market needs to be "thick" (as opposed to "thin"). High supply and a high price per unit make the market thick, as it limits the impact of a single transaction. In other words: If Ripple wants to revolutionize the way money travels, they actually need an insanely high market cap.
  11. Yeah... Jeff Bezos can sell his Amazon stocks without plummeting the price, amerite? Don't bogart that joint, my friend. Pass it over to me....
  12. Cute. But still FUD. On other forums I frequent, I'd call you a concern troll. How about you do some effort in proving yourself wrong, which would involve googling historical net worth of individuals? (Hint: the lousy 70-90billion USD of Buffet et al. are not a benchmark)
  13. Need Blockchain Bacon and Blockchain Burger now. And Blockchain Fries.
  14. So it boils down to people not knowing what they do. Wow... I never bothered to check these "complaints" as I have created my own setup for a wallet and ditched gatehub. Good to know that they are reliable. So, basically, you managed to profit from some arbitrage opportunities?
  15. No, the activation of accs was slowed down for all exchanges. Not being able to send xrp from gatehub to other exchanges for arbitrage purpose is what makes me raise an eyebrow.
  16. What's your experience with finance in general?
  17. Sia and Factom. Because utility. And,.... hate me for it, but XLM
  18. Oh, you are totally right. And yes, people should do some due dilligence, which includes typing "[Broker name] scam" into google. I usually am a bit twisted when people are gullible and still use questionable providers. Imagine someone still using gatehub after the farce they had during the last bull run - can't help everybody...
  19. So.... all in all just a wonderful confirmation that todays prices nowhere reflect XRP's value and we should all buy while it's cheap.
  20. Because the market cap got to high. After all, it's "capped", like in market CAP. Ya knooowwww
  21. Oanda has been market making in the FX markets and is known for requotes and notorious extreme spread widening both pre and post news. While widening spreads are the norm during news events one can exaggerate the narrative of the market maker protecting himself from inventory risk. Oanda did forgive 15.01.15 caused negative balances. Well, they had to, not filling orders was not an excuse for anybody. In any case, Oanda is very expensive, they slam a crazy premium on ECN-Broker standard bid-ask spreads and frankly they should be avoided as there are much more transparent and better priced brokers. Examples would be Dukascopy or Activtrades.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.