MathewAnderson Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 In a recent episode of the Crypto Law Twitter talk show, Deaton initiated the discussion by probing Fagel about the consequences of making the Hinman emails public. Responding to Deaton’s query, SEC regional director Marc Fagel aligned his views with Hogan, who had previously offered insights into the ethical implications of the email disclosures. Marc Fagel Comment on Hinman Emails Fagel concurred that making the emails public hurts William Hinman's reputation even though it doesn't materially change the course of the main legal dispute. Fagel expressed reservations about the optics of the situation, deeming it unusual. He suggested that such developments were likely to cause discomfort among SEC staff. Quote The release of the Hinman documents has generated a multitude of perplexing questions and revealed inconsistencies in the SEC’s approach to cryptocurrency regulations. Do you agree with the SEC statement behind all these events that it is "protecting American investors". Shoot your Comments down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 (edited) ex-SEC directors are only worth listening to, for amusement purposes Edited June 17 by HAL1000 PlanK 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now