peanut56 Posted March 25 Share Posted March 25 Below is a tweet from. @MetaLawMan . It Gives what I would assume is correct information the fact that because a digital asset exists, does not mean that it is a security, which is a good thing because the official position is neutral and at least with words they acknowledge that not all D.A. are securities. The actions taken, even if illegitimate/illiterate/strategic can be challenges with direct referencing of security laws themselves instead of what the S.E.C wants those security laws to be/mean/enforce-ability over the duration of the development and implementation of Blockchain itself. JASCoder, HAL1000, PunishmentOfLuxury and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now