HAL1000 Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted March 23 Author Share Posted March 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted March 23 Author Share Posted March 23 (edited) Having read this new line of BS from the SEC, I can honestly say, HEY SEC, the judge knows her job, she don't need the likes of you criminals telling her how to do it. She knows how to interpret the law, I'm not so sure you ass hat pricks do (thanx to Moon Lambo for that saying). If you really wanted to pi*ss off the judge, I think the document above would just about clinch it for Ripple Edited March 23 by HAL1000 woodman_73 and JASCoder 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted March 24 Author Share Posted March 24 More from JH on this taken from this Twitter thread... "I think these are two cases that are bad for the SEC and this reply negates the Bittner decision a little but doesn't take away much bite from the Voyage judge's ruling. But it's all FND stuff.." "That Voyager order is really good for Ripple." I'm not a lawyer, but I think that's just what I said, but phrased more politely, thanks for agreeing with me JH woodman_73 and PunishmentOfLuxury 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now