EXFI airdrop

[xrp-nuke]

18 minutes ago, Ripley said:

Those addresses that claimed FLR include exchanges which have either made no promises or explicitly said they won’t support SGB. Also you can know the address from the claim but you cannot airdrop on those addresses unless the network is live, so problems that I mentioned above still exist. Knowing claim addresses doesn’t solve anything.

But canary network is here and it was airdroped based of mechanics from FLR.

Still can not see an issue why EXFI have to further to reduce audience.

[xrp-nuke]

21 minutes ago, Ripley said:

For flare, testing is about network fragility in real world conditions. For flare Finance, it’s about testing tokenomics. I don’t think world would have patience for a network with issues like the ones that Ethereum, XRPL, Solana etc encountered. Solana was particularly bad. There is no easy way to test for real world conditions. Only way is to have production like environments and test in the real world.

I agree with you that Flare could have mentioned Songbird ahead of time, but it was a learning experience for them too.

See my other post where I think its more than earn rather than learn. Especially for Flare Finance.

Afterall the environment here is 98% speculative 2% is rest.

Also now its not clear which network will eventually evolve, today it canary after 4 years its a production network with its own products and clients. Eventually demand will drive the requirement and distribution can play key role.

[Guest]

47 minutes ago, xrp-nuke said:

But canary network is here and it was airdroped based of mechanics from FLR.

Still can not see an issue why EXFI have to further to reduce audience.

But those addresses that claimed FLR belong to exchanges and not individuals. How can they transfer funds to individuals when they never directly claimed FLR ? May be I’m misunderstanding what you’re trying to say.

Canary airdrop (SGB) was airdropped to those same addresses and now exchanges that wanted to distribute SGB already did. The others may never distribute and unless exchanges share the % distribution of their users, SGB cannot be used to give ExFi to everyone.

Edited December 3, 2021 by Ripley

[Guest]

44 minutes ago, xrp-nuke said:

See my other post where I think its more than earn rather than learn. Especially for Flare Finance.

Afterall the environment here is 98% speculative 2% is rest.

Also now its not clear which network will eventually evolve, today it canary after 4 years its a production network with its own products and clients. Eventually demand will drive the requirement and distribution can play key role.

I fully agree.

All I’m saying is they don’t really have an option - at least not one I can think of.  If they send it to original addresses, those tokens are just getting black holed.
 

May be that is what you are suggesting. Just distribute per original plan and if product is successful, exchanges will eventually distribute to customers. If product is not successful, those tokens won’t have value anyway. Is that what you are trying to say ? If so, I will support that approach. I think that is what they should consider doing too.

[xrp-nuke]

26 minutes ago, Ripley said:

May be that is what you are suggesting. Just distribute per original plan and if product is successful, exchanges will eventually distribute to customers. If product is not successful, those tokens won’t have value anyway. Is that what you are trying to say ? If so, I will support that approach. I think that is what they should consider doing too.

Yes this is exactly what I say and stand for.