HAL1000 Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 (edited) IT STARTS AT THE RIGHT TIME - JUST 2 MINUTES TO LISTEN TO GG THEN PLAY 30 SECONDS OF THE NEXT CLIP. HIS WORDS "THE MARKET NEEDS CLARITY" THE SEC'S CASE IS BUILT ON THE FACT THAT RIPPLE / BRAD AND CHRIS SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THEY WERE SELLING SECURITIES BUT EVEN GENSLER IN HIS OWN WORDS COULD NOT TELL HIS CLASS WITH CLARITY, WHAT THE SEC'S OWN STANCE ON ALL THIS WAS AND HE WAS BEING PAID AS A LECTURER FOR HIS EXPERTISE ON THESE MATTERS? BUT NOW ITS VERY CLEAR, SO WHICH VERSION OF GARY SHOULD WE BE LISTENING TO? HEY GG IT'S VERY CLEAR, THAT THIS LAWSUIT IS BS, BECAUSE IF IT WASN'T CLEAR TO YOU AS AN MIT LECTURER IN BLOCKCHAIN BACK THEN, THEN WHY SHOULD ANYBODY BELIEVE THE SEC'S OR YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT CLARITY IN THE MARKET NOW? FU GG Edited November 9, 2021 by HAL1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now