HAL1000 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted September 21, 2021 Author Share Posted September 21, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanut56 Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Although the judge did not give the data ripple was seeking she did however give a decent nod. This is I believe from the second link. "Because the preclearance process does not consider whether an asset is a security, Defendants have not shown that such individual trading decisions bear on the issues in the case. Although the SEC's policies (or absence of policies) may provide relevant evidence related to fair notice or recklessness, how an Ethics Counsel viewed a trading decision is more likely to cause confusing or create litigation disputes." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now