HAL1000 Posted September 7, 2021 Share Posted September 7, 2021 (edited) Edited September 7, 2021 by HAL1000 RobertHarpool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted September 7, 2021 Author Share Posted September 7, 2021 (edited) Edited September 7, 2021 by HAL1000 RobertHarpool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted September 7, 2021 Author Share Posted September 7, 2021 RobertHarpool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian_Williams Posted September 7, 2021 Share Posted September 7, 2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOTWGBEzWls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted September 8, 2021 Author Share Posted September 8, 2021 (edited) Edited September 8, 2021 by HAL1000 DannyRipple, xrp_is_love_xrp_is_life, PunishmentOfLuxury and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertHarpool Posted September 10, 2021 Share Posted September 10, 2021 (edited) MOTION DENIED ... as moot :-S Edited September 10, 2021 by RobertHarpool Ahchai and VanHasen 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanHasen Posted September 11, 2021 Share Posted September 11, 2021 2 hours ago, RobertHarpool said: MOTION DENIED ... as moot :-S If i understand correctly this means its denied because its now irrelevant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanHasen Posted September 11, 2021 Share Posted September 11, 2021 10 minutes ago, VanHasen said: If i understand correctly this means its denied because its now irrelevant? To answer my own question, I found out that in a previous motion ripple asked the court to deny the sec's motion to compel as moot because they already produced the most part of recordings from staff meetings and will be complete before the motion is fully briefed. Seems that theres not much meat in it for the sec as ripple didnt even fight this request and started to produce promptly RobertHarpool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyRipple Posted September 11, 2021 Share Posted September 11, 2021 5 minutes ago, VanHasen said: To answer my own question, I found out that in a previous motion ripple asked the court to deny the sec's motion to compel as moot because they already produced the most part of recordings from staff meetings and will be complete before the motion is fully briefed. Seems that theres not much meat in it for the sec as ripple didnt even fight this request and started to produce promptly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panmores Posted September 11, 2021 Share Posted September 11, 2021 "Key former employee"... who's it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanHasen Posted September 11, 2021 Share Posted September 11, 2021 I think jed was involved and I wonder what he has thought would happen with xlm in this bullrun while passing out his competition. I mean xlm even got outperformed by XRP this year and that with having burned away a big junk of supply and probably getting some kind of immunity by the sec. Being a xrp holder is hard, sure, but this lawsuit happens to provide xrp the opportunity to be the first with actual clear reg. in the US - not even eth has this. The price for this opp. is being dragged down temporarily. Xlm on the other hand... Surely not easy to hold but its time will come, I m sure panmores and VanGogh 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paym8 Posted September 11, 2021 Share Posted September 11, 2021 It was not Jed, It was the former compliance officer, I cant recall her name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lizshadehdg Posted September 12, 2021 Share Posted September 12, 2021 On 9/11/2021 at 9:43 AM, panmores said: "Key former employee"... who's it? My guess is Vias? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paym8 Posted September 12, 2021 Share Posted September 12, 2021 It was compliance officer, Antoinette O’Gorman revealed for the first time in the lawsuit, in her deposition of 4th August, 3 hours ago, lizshadehdg said: My guess is Vias? as in my post above yours. lizshadehdg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now