Jump to content

YT'ers vs SEC BS


HAL1000
 Share

Recommended Posts

YTbers are now turning into bounty hunters :) competing to be the first to prove Clayton/Hinman/Gensler are up to their eyes in corruption at the SEC.  I think the evidence is likely to be there because dishonest people are by definition stupid and arrogant.  Carelessness and having enemies generally goes with stupidity and arrogance, so I reckon there will be whistleblowers and smoking gun wallets with maybe connections to offshore bank accounts.  I would be sweating if I were Hinman or Clayton :diablo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.