Call in details for tommorow.

[HAL1000]

 

[NMNR]

Anyone from the UK willing to share details on how to dial cost effectively?

[NightJanitor]

1 hour ago, NMNR said:

Anyone from the UK willing to share details on how to dial cost effectively?

If there's a fee for dialing in, I'll just talk to the operator after the call and have the phone company reverse the charges.

In fact, that's exactly what I'd tell the Judge that she ought to do in this case.   (All the corruption/scienter is at SEC!)

 

 

Edited August 31, 2021 by NightJanitor

[RipMcGillicuddy]

Anyone else on this call? Hoping for some fireworks. Expecting a gut punch. 

[RipMcGillicuddy]

Oh boy she is turning the heat up on Jorge a little bit now. 

[VanGogh]

11 minutes ago, RipMcGillicuddy said:

Oh boy she is turning the heat up on Jorge a little bit now. 

He's being a bit of a smart ash; he has it coming!

Her "inclination is to conduct an in-camera review".

[VanGogh]

Jorge is trying to argue why she shouldn't allow an in-camera review.

[VanGogh]

I think she wants to see the documents herself (before issuing a ruling as to whether or not Ripple can see them), so she can ask more pertinent questions, etc.

[RipMcGillicuddy]

Just now, VanGogh said:

I think she wants to see the documents herself (before issuing a ruling as to whether or not Ripple can see them), so she can ask more pertinent questions, etc.

Definitely. Just hope these are the documents Ripple needed to hone in on. Gotta be something in there. 

[HAL1000]

Listening in, I get the impression the judge is like WTF is this SEC guy on about, does the SEC lawyer even know.

[RipMcGillicuddy]

Ripple are getting almost every chance they need to win or get a favorable ruling here. Hope all the money they've spent on lawyers turns out to be worth it. 

[VanGogh]

3 minutes ago, RipMcGillicuddy said:

Hope all the money they've spent on lawyers turns out to be worth it

Their lawyers seem to be very good. Their arguments are far more clear and easily understood than those from the SEC.

[VanGogh]

9 minutes ago, RipMcGillicuddy said:

Definitely. Just hope these are the documents Ripple needed to hone in on. Gotta be something in there. 

There it is, Ripple's lawyer suggested the judge may want to look at additional documents beyond those in appendix A (those getting in-camera review). Ripple's lawyers are sharp!

[RipMcGillicuddy]

Wow. Ripple's team is in a different league here than the SEC's legal team. 

[HAL1000]

Just for those not tuned in, the court has ordered an in camera review of some SEC documents, so she can judge what should or should not be passed to Ripple. The SEC tried to argue no to that, but the judge has ruled