HAL1000 Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
princesultan Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 Very good. How we can catch the tail end of this bull run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian_Williams Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 (edited) It seems in an answer to the judge the SEC gave the green light for exchanges in the US to re-open and trade in XRP. It also seems to give the green light for ODL to restart. 8.57 - in answer to the judge SEC's lawyer stated Under section 4 - only Ripple or Employees of Ripple can illegally sell XRP So exchanges and ODL can legally use XRP as a currency Also this begs the question - why did SEC not exclude traders in XRP from their case. As Deaton points out in his letter in other the cases SEC did that, but in this case they made no such clause. In my opinion this is a green light for exchanges to start trading, ODL to start up, and banks to use XRP. This rips the heart out of SEC case and the fact that they let the whole XRP ecosystem shut down for no good reason shows them up to be malicious. Edited March 20, 2021 by Julian_Williams Baka, JASCoder, WarChest and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
princesultan Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 10 minutes ago, Julian_Williams said: It seems in an answer to the judge the SEC gave the green light for exchanges in the US to re-open and trade in XRP. It also seems to give the green light for ODL to restart. I mean, it was subtle. Let’s see if anything comes of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian_Williams Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, princesultan said: I mean, it was subtle. Let’s see if anything comes of it. Hi @princesultan - I redrafted that to be more explicit of what Jeremy reported. It is a statement in court by a SEC lawyer. That looks like very good cover for an exchange, bank or FX company to restart business. It is there on the record as an official interpretation of section 4 by SEC legal department. Edited March 20, 2021 by Julian_Williams princesultan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
princesultan Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 3 minutes ago, Julian_Williams said: Hi @princesultan - I redrafted that to be more explicit of what Jeremy reported. It is a statement in court by a SEC lawyer. That looks like very good cover for an exchange, bank or FX company to restart business. It is there on the record as an official interpretation of section 4 by SEC legal department. I’d love to hear that in the actual call recording but I’m not going to listen to it again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL1000 Posted March 20, 2021 Author Share Posted March 20, 2021 (edited) It's a statement the SEC could have made right at the start of this fiasco or many years ago, strange how they never did, some might interpret it as deliberate sabotage! The SEC providing clarity at last, FU SEC... How many exchanges de-listed, based on the FUD you caused, how many man-hours, suicides and billions were wasted, whilst deciding to clarify? The SEC protecting investors is our primary mission! Edited March 20, 2021 by HAL1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian_Williams Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 1 hour ago, HAL1000 said: It's a statement the SEC could have made right at the start of this fiasco or many years ago, strange how they never did, some might interpret it as deliberate sabotage! The SEC providing clarity at last, FU SEC... How many exchanges de-listed, based on the FUD you caused, how many man-hours, suicides and billions were wasted, whilst deciding to clarify? The SEC protecting investors is our primary mission! Yes SEC has important questions to answer. Given the things we are learning about Hinman's self interested relationship with ETH and Clayton's choice of new work mates there are big question marks emerging over the motivations behind their actions whilst they were working with SEC. HAL1000 and JASCoder 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussianStandards Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 1 hour ago, princesultan said: I’d love to hear that in the actual call recording but I’m not going to listen to it again It was at the 1:05 point princesultan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingFox Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 https://vocaroo.com/12G0WTwmRfWV Minute 67 to about minute 69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baka Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 so I guess in the coming days , price should go up a bit at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussianStandards Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 7 minutes ago, Baka said: so I guess in the coming days , price should go up a bit at least Don’t be silly Baka and RobertHarpool 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
princesultan Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 1 hour ago, FlyingFox said: https://vocaroo.com/12G0WTwmRfWV Minute 67 to about minute 69 Maybe I’m hard of hearing but I didn’t hear the SEC say that the securities issue only applies to ripple Gepster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now