Popular Post JoelKatz 8,265 Posted October 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 2, 2019 Some enhancements could be made to the XRP Ledger to provide better support for emerging use cases in decentralized finance. For example, validations could be augmented to include the last fully-validated ledger. This would permit validators to automatically operate as oracles and allow, for example, users to prove to Ethereum smart contracts that particular things happened on the XRP Ledger. This post is one suggestion for an enhancement to the XRP Ledger. See this post for context:https://www.xrpchat.com/topic/33070-suggestions-for-xrp-ledger-enhancements/ You can find all the suggestions in one place here: https://coil.com/p/xpring/Ideas-for-the-Future-of-XRP-Ledger/-OZP0FlZQ aavkk, Truckdriver, JoelMcD and 12 others 14 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JoelMcD 61 Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 Yep, I think this one's a winner. Malloy 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Sukrim 1,874 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 I'd like to see something concrete... "the last fully validated ledger" is already over 1 GiB without inner nodes, if this refers to ledger state. Do you mean only the transaction trie? Or how should a "validation" look like in this case? 8 hours ago, JoelMcD said: Yep, I think this one's a winner. Why do you think that, what's your proposed implementation? Jerrybo 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JoelMcD 61 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 13 hours ago, Sukrim said: Why do you think that, what's your proposed implementation? I see anything that improves interoperability as a good thing. In this case, you'd be making it easier for smart contracts, which will underpin stock trades, derivatives, etc, to operate on their ledger of choice (Ethereum, cardano, hedera, whatever) and still take advantage of XRPL for settlement. Odiseo 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Sukrim 1,874 Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 So what exactly would I write in my ERC20 contract/program to interact with XRPL that's not currently possible? tulo and Jerrybo 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Jerrybo 82 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 I agree here (again ) with @Sukrim: I'd like to see something concrete. We need to unterstand a current issue that needs to be solved. As he said "...that's not currently possible". Without a specific issue we could tend to just implement a solution for a problem that doens't really exist. Link to post Share on other sites
tulo 3,118 Posted October 8, 2019 Share Posted October 8, 2019 I don't see a possible implementation for this. Clarification? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now