JoelKatz 8,240 Posted October 2 Some enhancements could be made to the XRP Ledger to provide better support for emerging use cases in decentralized finance. For example, validations could be augmented to include the last fully-validated ledger. This would permit validators to automatically operate as oracles and allow, for example, users to prove to Ethereum smart contracts that particular things happened on the XRP Ledger. This post is one suggestion for an enhancement to the XRP Ledger. See this post for context:https://www.xrpchat.com/topic/33070-suggestions-for-xrp-ledger-enhancements/ You can find all the suggestions in one place here: https://coil.com/p/xpring/Ideas-for-the-Future-of-XRP-Ledger/-OZP0FlZQ 15 1 Baboly, RikkiTikki, Let_her_Ripple and 13 others reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoelMcD 61 Posted October 2 Yep, I think this one's a winner. 1 Malloy reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sukrim 1,766 Posted October 3 I'd like to see something concrete... "the last fully validated ledger" is already over 1 GiB without inner nodes, if this refers to ledger state. Do you mean only the transaction trie? Or how should a "validation" look like in this case? 8 hours ago, JoelMcD said: Yep, I think this one's a winner. Why do you think that, what's your proposed implementation? 1 Jerrybo reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoelMcD 61 Posted October 3 13 hours ago, Sukrim said: Why do you think that, what's your proposed implementation? I see anything that improves interoperability as a good thing. In this case, you'd be making it easier for smart contracts, which will underpin stock trades, derivatives, etc, to operate on their ledger of choice (Ethereum, cardano, hedera, whatever) and still take advantage of XRPL for settlement. 1 Odiseo reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sukrim 1,766 Posted October 4 So what exactly would I write in my ERC20 contract/program to interact with XRPL that's not currently possible? 1 1 tulo and Jerrybo reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jerrybo 50 Posted October 5 I agree here (again ) with @Sukrim: I'd like to see something concrete. We need to unterstand a current issue that needs to be solved. As he said "...that's not currently possible". Without a specific issue we could tend to just implement a solution for a problem that doens't really exist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tulo 3,023 Posted October 8 I don't see a possible implementation for this. Clarification? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
