Jump to content

Suggestions for XRP Ledger enhancements

Recommended Posts

Hey @JoelKatz it would probably be best if you created a Club with these various topics listed in a single location. Maybe one of the moderators @Pablo, @Mercury, @Global, @Morty, @xrphilosophy, could help you get that set-up. It would probably be a good thing if they could also pin it to the "Active Topics" list so that everyone can see it  regardless of what topic heading they under.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clubs have a very limited visibility, but I agree that this is maybe not the optimal format... I am unsure what would be though - GitHub issues? Formal RFCs? Chat rooms? Anyways, thanks for engaging an open discussion about these ideas in the first place, since so far it felt a lot like features were either implemented out of personal motivation or business needs and not widely feedbacked before a Pull Request landed.

Let's hope a few more developers from Ripple will also join the discussion on here! :-)


Edit: Here's a helpful post by @Hodor that links to all the threads (probably better to have this on the first page of the thread here):


6 hours ago, Hodor said:
Edited by Sukrim
Link to post
Share on other sites

Re:Performance and Resource Consumption

For me the memory requirements are the most expensive aspect of running a stock node. Assuming memory will get cheaper, keeping the requirement of ~16-32gb, no matter what the future average tps is would be very helpful to the average Joe's budgeting. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Pablo featured this topic
  • karlos pinned this topic

"technological dead end" - shots fired!

I really enjoy you, David. You do great work and communicate well. Thanks - I wish you the best.

Edit: From a product point of view, I really like the idea of robust auditing. Given the complexity of features offered by XRP,  the need for log compliance,  a demand for "tier 0" SIEM integration , actionable log workflows, forensics, etc - clients certainly will appreciate attention here. 


Edited by Undershoes
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if this is reasonable but something I think would be useful is an option to require a condition with EscrowCancel like EscrowFinish has.  This would be useful for letting a 3rd party decide whether the funds get transferred or not and not relying on a time based lock.

Edited by mitchlang009
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, JoelKatz said:

We’ve been working on a number of possible features and design changes that could be introduced to the XRP Ledger, and we want input from the entire community about these features.

Sounds like you have already built the features and as kitao would say "just have to press button" to implement them. :biggrin: Whats the ETA?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • karlos unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.