Jump to content

BigchainDB (uses ILP), Tymlez and Leondrino Exchange Join Forces


Recommended Posts

BigChainDB is going to use ILP:

 

"About Leondrino Exchange, Inc.
Leondrino Exchange, Inc., located in New York, introduces a new type of branded virtual currencies, called Leondrino, that are related to the current and future business of global brands. 
With its LEX Platform, Leondrino Exchange combines all tools and services necessary to manage the life cycle of both loyalty points and Leondrino Currencies and to meet the requirements of safety, privacy, security and regulation. The LEX Platform provides a valuable foundation for data-based business models in several industries, e.g. Financial Services, Entertainment, Energy, Transportation and Healthcare.

About Tymlez Software and Consultancy BV
Tymlez Software and Consultancy BV, based in Amsterdam, focuses on the selection and development of tools and technologies to build a smart enterprise blockchain platform. Based on strong and proven IT leadership experience with global players, it builds blockchain-based solutions for enterprises that integrates with existing mission critical applications."


http://www.openpr.com/news/365824/BigchainDB-Tymlez-and-Leondrino-Exchange-Join-Forces-to-provide-Enterprise-Solutions-Based-on-Blockchain-Technology.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dimitri demo'd an ILP-integrated BigChainDB last winter at the Ripple HQ Interledger day. Very cool and impressive - If I remember correctly, getting it working took just a few days. The fact that you can get a basic implementation working so quickly (given your ledger/db supports certain things already) was great news for ILP's future, something we're beginning to see the fruits of already with these "private" ILP implementations. Good news for the standardization end, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tomxcs said:

Dimitri demo'd an ILP-integrated BigChainDB last winter at the Ripple HQ Interledger day. Very cool and impressive - If I remember correctly, getting it working took just a few days. The fact that you can get a basic implementation working so quickly (given your ledger/db supports certain things already) was great news for ILP's future, something we're beginning to see the fruits of already with these "private" ILP implementations. Good news for the standardization end, too.

Yeah it really is. To get traction for any standard it has to be as simple as possible in terms of the structure of the protocol itself and how easy it is to hook into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...