Live4xrp Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 (edited) The Interledger Protocol will potentially be able to deliver any asset into any account and will trade assets as needed to construct the necessary paths. We believe that the Interledger Protocol is the best designed solution to the looming interoperability problems of the evolving multi-ledger ecosystem. http://www.eit.lth.se/sprapport.php?uid=987 And a Report of KPMG (i've not seen yet) on the "Immutable agreement on the Internet of Value" - 10 pages on Ripple https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/appendix3-kpmg-blockchain-paper.pdf Edited August 14, 2016 by Live4xrp nik, Kakoyla, Stoky and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodor Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 (edited) 59 minutes ago, Live4xrp said: 10 pages on Ripple And a bunch of other blockchains as well - very interesting to read the responses from Ripple (via Bob Way). My favorite questions and answers (from the KPMG interview results): Quote Provide some general measures of volume that the consensus mechanism can or will handle (e.g., # of trades) Unlimited. Provide some general measures of the value that the consensus mechanism can or will handle (e.g., $ value of trades) Unlimited. Is the speed of the system impacted if the system is made more scalable? No Edited August 14, 2016 by Hodor rippleric, Kakoyla and thinlyspread 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabrielpsc Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 What do you think about these articles https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/kpmg-blockchain-consensus-mechanism.pdf https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/appendix3-kpmg-blockchain-paper.pdf and what do you guys think about the answer to the last question from the interview with Bob Way (bob@ripple.com)? PRX 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kicker Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Great objective article about the current state of DLTs. Seems to be imo positive about Ripple: "The search for consensus mechanisms that are reliable for financial institutions and acceptable to regulators led developers to systems that don’t depend on bitcoin and proof-of-work. Ripple, developed in 2012, was the first significant new one." In the maneuvering the road ahead section, many of the concerns they express for DLTs moving forward are the areas where Ripple/XRP shines: performance, stability, standards, regulatory compliance. "One of the main problems involved is network stability. It’s essential for the network to be running without stoppage even for a second. We expect performance and latency of distributed ledger technologies to continually improve, but there may eventually be structural limitations with blockchain and distributed ledger technologies which might limit their adoption to use cases where there isn’t a focus on very low latency and very high transaction volume." And "Today’s financial services industry, in particular capital markets, has been built on various standards over the years. Yet, although we are seeing consortiums being formed and regulators showing interest, the increasing proliferation of blockchain and DLTs has not shown true signs of standardization, which may become key for adoption and regulatory acceptance." I like that they end the article saying the issues moving ahead for DLTs are exactly what Ripple is focusing on. Good signs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercury Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 @gabrielpsc merged with another existing thread gabrielpsc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now