nik Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Looks like this was the last attempt. Someone is too stuborn to admit failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T8493 Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 People are dumping their Lumens on Poloniex: https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_str Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-fault123 Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Quote October 5, 2016: The first round of the lumen giveaway to bitcoin holders will conclude. If there are unclaimed lumens, they’ll go to Stellar.org’s operational fund. Okay, so presumably there might be lots and lots of unclaimed lumens going to stellar.org's operational fund after the giveaway. Good luck funding your operations by dumping billions of stallers, I mean lamers, I mean lumens on amazingly illiquid markets. nik and Phintech 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tulo Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 And again verification via Facebook. What a joke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoelKatz Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 For those people who ask why Ripple says so little about its XRP distribution plans, it's to avoid this kind of thing. "For bitcoin holders, distribution will begin within 6 months after Stellar is open to the public." http://web.archive.org/web/20140801061827/https://www.stellar.org/about/mandate/ thinlyspread, rippleric, T8493 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanaas Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 1 hour ago, JoelKatz said: For those people who ask why Ripple says so little about its XRP distribution plans, it's to avoid this kind of thing. "For bitcoin holders, distribution will begin within 6 months after Stellar is open to the public." http://web.archive.org/web/20140801061827/https://www.stellar.org/about/mandate/ An asset like XRP has to be "used", not distributed or given away. Compare it to other companies like for instance Tesla. They as well can never become profitable by giving away the batteries and cars they've produced... After that one huge mistake when some XRP were given to founders, I think Ripple did a rather good job in using XRP to build on its business case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoelKatz Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 8 hours ago, kanaas said: After that one huge mistake when some XRP were given to founders, I think Ripple did a rather good job in using XRP to build on its business case. Not to be a pedant, but no XRP was ever given to the founders. The founders gave XRP to the company, not the other way around. I agree with you that in retrospect it appears that everyone would have benefited had the deal been structured differently. But I'm not sure whether that's something that could have even conceivably have been foreseen back then. nik 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tulo Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 1 hour ago, JoelKatz said: I agree with you that in retrospect it appears that everyone would have benefited had the deal been structured differently. But I'm not sure whether that's something that could have even conceivably have been foreseen back then. Not at that time, but why not now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 They were quick to reply to my first sarcastic tweet but no reply to the second yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanaas Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 1 hour ago, JoelKatz said: Not to be a pedant, but no XRP was ever given to the founders. The founders gave XRP to the company, not the other way around. That's ridiculous. Or you start a company or you keep the whole thing as a private and worthless idea. XRP is nothing without Ripple the company. It's the company that creates value for XRP - not just the birth of the tokens before they even become an asset. Keeping such a large stake of those assets while Ripple, the company, develops value for them is in my opinion from a very low level of pure greed. Ok that Jed made a run for his money - we now all know about his $$$ motif meaning he will never give those XRP back - , but the other two, still being part of the family, they could do something back for Ripple (besides pretending some recruitment of volunteers for RippleWorks) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanaas Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 1 hour ago, JoelKatz said: I agree with you that in retrospect it appears that everyone would have benefited had the deal been structured differently. But I'm not sure whether that's something that could have even conceivably have been foreseen back then. Well if you really want to do something about it why not overthink it? Don't know if it legally can, but why not convert those founder XRP to a kind of "class B XRP" or name it shares in the company? Or some other solution to disconnect their price completely from the other, call them "class A XRP"? I'm sure this is technically and maybe even legally possible. It would also allow Jed to resell them as shares without having to much pressure on the price of XRP.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now