Jump to content

meegwell

Member
  • Content Count

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by meegwell

  1. I am on the "do not destroy" end of discovery requests and this type of things somewhat often. Our in house attorneys take it very seriously (large cap public US company. One example given is it only takes them to find one document that clearly should have been submitted and you are now on the wrong side of the law. Penalties bigger than the risks and it's easier to get caught then you may think. That is my thought and practice in my world but every circumstance is different.
  2. Found it. Again, don't know if it's here already. Filed today. Subpoena to One River Digital asking for all sorts of documents related to Clayton's communications and role with One River, particular to details concerning ETH, XRP, and BTC. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082.126.5.pdf Requests start on page 5.
  3. I forget the actual type of filing but thought it was filed very recently. It was seeking data/communications/etc related to Jay Claytons role at One River and specifically communications regarding classification of BTC, ETH, and XRP.
  4. h) Tokens Previously Sold. An Initial Development Team that prior to the effective date of this rule sold Tokens pursuant to a valid exemption from registration or sold in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 as determined in a Commission order pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 that does not identify any other violations of the federal securities laws may rely on this section if the conditions of paragraph (a) are satisfied. The notice of reliance required by paragraph (c) of this section must be filed as soon as practicable.
  5. I am not looking for pro-XRP sites, just not those that obviously hate on Ripple/XRP and refuse to publish anything positive or have to take a jab no matter what the story. Just straight up daily crypto news and information.
  6. and what,specifically, is the fraud? Seriously. Try not to use slang words like “dump”. What has been proven to be fraudulent? XRP is not legally determined to be a security at this point. Founders are legally allowed to sell XRP. Explain to me this fraudulent behavior you speak of?
  7. With this number - if I recall correctly - we should be able to guesstimate the distribution ration correct or no?
  8. Hi OP here. I waited a few days and checked a couple ledger viewers and see the modified eth address in the message and I see a Flare Address noted also. Think I'm good and thank you all for the input. What is the secret key for my Flare address? I assume I can't do anything with it until the network launched but I am just curious.
  9. After hitting "update" for the message field using xrptoolkit I got a few popup errors - simple messages something like "failed to send" - I am using Firefox. I shut it down then went to xrpscan to look up my address. I see the Flare message (modified ETH) and also the Flare Account under it. Should I be OK? Also I had to re-paste the modified ETH address I got an "invalid size" message the first time. I am guessing I pasted an extra space or something. Just sharing the experience and wondering if others had the same or similar.
  10. I may have got around my Bithomp tools disconnected issue - found my way to GitHub and will go offline from there.
  11. Thanks....but for the tools I get: " The project "Bithomp tools" is discontinued because it's technical capabilities no longer meet the needs of the modern marketplace. It is recommended to use hardware wallets. If you have a papper wallet you can also download XUMM app on your mobile and import your paper wallet there.
  12. I think this is what I need, and what makes me feel safe. I'll bust out my Commodore Vic-20 and unplug it from the modem. Nobody getting in there
  13. I assume you phrased up your answer based on my original subject line only, and not my actual question, so that is understandable. Sorry for the confusion.
  14. Because I want to use my ledger nano X to manage my XRP and setup my spark/flare drop? I am confident my secret key is fine, although I have no real issue checking that I will obviously be taking that step while moving it to my nano address. Does this not make sense (serious question)?
  15. I still haven't figured out how to do this so I am coming back to some of my previous posts. If all I have are the public and private keys (and I can see my balance in various places including XRP Toolkit), at what point, where and how do I use my secret key to move XRP out to another wallet (like a Nano)? For example in XRP Toolkit if I choose to Send 20 XRP from the wallet in question (for which I do have a secret key written down) to my Ledger Nano XRP account, I get a message saying "None of your added accounts can sign this transaction." What am
  16. I think the answer here is no. You have a wallet address that will be part of the snapshot. I believe the problem with exchnages is the shared ledger addresses (destination tags) so the exchange has to agree to allocate appropriately.
  17. I have only my public key (wallet address) and my secret key. Nothing else. Originally created in Rippex (sp?) in 2016. Assume I properly recorded my secret key, I should have no issues accesses/moving my xrp correct? I can see my balance and move xrp into the wallet from exchanges. How might I move some out safely and is it a risk using my secret key? By some I mean a small “test”.
  18. assuming net non ripple is 45bn. if that were to change it would change the ratio. I understand that will not happen in any significant measure but the math is what it is - it’s about 1:1 depending on what the ratio of ripple held xrp is.
  19. Does the math here work out such that assuming you remove ~escrow+ your allotment is roughly equal to your current holdings of XRP?
  20. This article is incorrect or very misleading. On July 31 Ripple filed a motion to dismiss the case - essentially asking the court to dismiss it. The court filing was drafted and submitted by Ripple and they make several strong arguments as to why the court should dismiss the case. The court now has to rule on the motion to dismiss which I believe to be 30 days. They may choose to dismiss the case or reject the motion to dismiss and the case goes on. Bottom line: this significant court decision is still very much looming. Also, not sure how a “journalist” misunderstood this
  21. Jus got this also...I can see a lot of folks clicking on that it looks legit. Always check the email and url link and generally if it's too good to be true....On the bright side, people want XRP..?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.