meegwell

That's awesome! Thanks for sharing.

I agree. Different rules for those in Washington DC as we have learned a lot of lately.

I am on the "do not destroy" end of discovery requests and this type of things somewhat often. Our in house attorneys take it very seriously (large cap public US company. One example given is it only takes them to find one document that clearly should have been submitted and you are now on the wrong side of the law. Penalties bigger than the risks and it's easier to get caught then you may think. That is my thought and practice in my world but every circumstance is different.

Found it. Again, don't know if it's here already. Filed today. Subpoena to One River Digital asking for all sorts of documents related to Clayton's communications and role with One River, particular to details concerning ETH, XRP, and BTC. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082.126.5.pdf Requests start on page 5.

I forget the actual type of filing but thought it was filed very recently. It was seeking data/communications/etc related to Jay Claytons role at One River and specifically communications regarding classification of BTC, ETH, and XRP.

Thanks!

h) Tokens Previously Sold. An Initial Development Team that prior to the effective date of this rule sold Tokens pursuant to a valid exemption from registration or sold in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 as determined in a Commission order pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 that does not identify any other violations of the federal securities laws may rely on this section if the conditions of paragraph (a) are satisfied. The notice of reliance required by paragraph (c) of this section must be filed as soon as practicable.

I am not looking for pro-XRP sites, just not those that obviously hate on Ripple/XRP and refuse to publish anything positive or have to take a jab no matter what the story. Just straight up daily crypto news and information.

and what,specifically, is the fraud? Seriously. Try not to use slang words like “dump”. What has been proven to be fraudulent? XRP is not legally determined to be a security at this point. Founders are legally allowed to sell XRP. Explain to me this fraudulent behavior you speak of?

With this number - if I recall correctly - we should be able to guesstimate the distribution ration correct or no?

Thanks. I used a Nano X so Im all good I will note this.

Hi OP here. I waited a few days and checked a couple ledger viewers and see the modified eth address in the message and I see a Flare Address noted also. Think I'm good and thank you all for the input. What is the secret key for my Flare address? I assume I can't do anything with it until the network launched but I am just curious.

After hitting "update" for the message field using xrptoolkit I got a few popup errors - simple messages something like "failed to send" - I am using Firefox. I shut it down then went to xrpscan to look up my address. I see the Flare message (modified ETH) and also the Flare Account under it. Should I be OK? Also I had to re-paste the modified ETH address I got an "invalid size" message the first time. I am guessing I pasted an extra space or something. Just sharing the experience and wondering if others had the same or similar.

I may have got around my Bithomp tools disconnected issue - found my way to GitHub and will go offline from there.

Thanks....but for the tools I get: " The project "Bithomp tools" is discontinued because it's technical capabilities no longer meet the needs of the modern marketplace. It is recommended to use hardware wallets. If you have a papper wallet you can also download XUMM app on your mobile and import your paper wallet there.