Jump to content

rom

Member
  • Posts

    321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rom

  1. A good bit of positive energy here too. https://cryptoking.org/open-letter-to-mr-gary-gensler-chairman-of-the-u-s-securities-and-exchange-commission/
  2. Strictly speaking, during last month or so EM was moving only BTC + DOGE and only secondarily XRP + other alts. Of the big factors, XRP price is impacted by two: – SEC (short-to-medium term) and – Ripple (long term)*. SEC is responsible. for the current depression of XRP price. Ripple is responsible for creating these conditions of extreme XRP volatility. My point on XRP volatility – example from yesterday, 17.05.2021: H=1,30 Eur, L=1,08 Eur (as per Bitstamp), intraday delta > 20 Eurocents. This is bad for hodlers, but also a veritable profit machine for traders. I am wondering, if we can speak of two types of XRP utility now: one – THE transfer asset, the other – THE speculation vehicle. * — I exclude "whales" from this analysis, for they are jumping from asset to asset (like pumping XRP two days ago and then pumping ADA yesterday), and their impact is spread out more or less evenly.
  3. BNB surprising me. This is one very well managed coin.
  4. Speaking of investing in CB... I hear persistent rumours, that CB is one of those x, that have been using their clients' frozen XRP's to enrich themselves elsewhere. Couple of days ago read of another lady, who hasn't been able to get her XRP's out of CB for this whole delisting period, which goes against what CB help section says ("you will be able to deposit and withdraw..."). Just wondering how much truth is in those rumours.
  5. Not by much. 10 dollars is roughly the target, that makes billion dollar transactions possible.
  6. rom: Sorry to garbage-up this pristine thread with some more politics! I thought you may want to read this short informative article from Forbes magaz. Heavy shelling back at the SEC. Obtained via Reddit/Ripple from CryptoRookieX and Liagala, thanks to you! Liagala: "I had to jump through a few hoops to get the article to display without "X of 4 free articles" pop-ups, hidden text, and all that garbage. If you're having the same problem, here you go: Forbes article: Some agency chairs find an ambiguous statute hard to resist. They overinterpret their authority to regulate, and Congress too often goes along. The backstop of this excess is the courts, provided that the aggrieved have the wherewithal to defend themselves against the gargantuan administrative state. This familiar story is playing out in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against cryptocurrency innovator Ripple, but the buck stops with Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn whose discovery hearing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Tuesday exposed the SEC’s unfounded and flawed arguments and some inconvenient truths for former SEC Chair Jay Clayton and former SEC Corporation Finance Division head William Hinman. The hearing showed that the case the San Francisco fintech was based on an illogical premise. It alleged that XRP, the digital currency that Ripple uses for cross-border payments, has been an unregistered security since 2013 and that the SEC was just getting around to saying so on the last day of Clayton’s tenure last December. With this late in the game regulatory determination, the SEC now deems that every Ripple sale for seven years was an illegal securities trade. And that Ripple, its two top executives named in the suit, along with millions of retail holders, should have known this all along, even though the agency never did. Due process and fair notice were thrown out the window to get the case across the transom on the day that Clayton walked out the door. The hearing detailed the many vague, contradictory statements regulators made on cryptocurrency over the years. In 2018 Clayton told CNBC that bitcoin is not a security, and Hinman gave a widely covered speech which laid out how ether was not a security, despite debuting in an initial coin offering (ICO) in 2014. With XRP they said its status had “not been determined.” Trading platforms asked the SEC if XRP was a security before listing the token, and the agency refused to clarify. When asked whether XRP was a security, the then-chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Heath Tarbert in a 2020 interview declared, “It's unclear. Stay tuned. We're working closely with the SEC to figure out what falls into what box.” If these regulators were honest, they would admit that nothing in the 1933 Securities Act refers to cryptocurrency and then would request Congress to clarify the statue. Instead, the SEC made an unfounded determination with no warning or process. Back to Judge Netburn’s courtroom. Ripple requested the internal documentation to explain how and why the SEC arrived at their pronouncements as well as silence on these various coins. The SEC responded that nothing that was ever said by Clayton, Hinman or any SEC official about bitcoin or ether was that was an “official determination” on whether they are securities. It appears that Netburn is not buying the SEC’s argument that their many statements were not material. In a March 22 hearing, she told the SEC her understanding of XRP: “. . . not only does it have a currency value but it has a utility, and that utility distinguishes it from bitcoin and ether.” This rejects the SEC’s story that XRP has never had utility. Netburn ordered the SEC to produce all communications related to XRP, bitcoin, and ether where a third party was involved, and any formal internal documents “expressing the agency's interpretation or views” on cryptocurrency, and to deliver them to Ripple. She granted most of Ripple’s motion, which means that the discovery could be a treasure trove of embarrassing information for the SEC. This could mean game over for the SEC’s case against Ripple and more largely, a serious blow to the agency’s credibility. Other defendants will cite the SEC’s arbitrary and capricious nature. These disclosures could bring new headaches to scandal-plagued Apollo Capital Management which Clayton joined upon leaving the SEC, ostensibly to clean up the mess left by founder Leon Black and his links to Jeffrey Epstein. The timing of the lawsuit on Clayton’s last day and his subsequent hiring by a crypto-focused hedge fund are very curious coincidences. Conflict of interest concerns could also intensify for Hinman, now back at his old firm Simpson Thacher, which paid him a $1.6 million annual pension while he worked at the SEC. Hinman’s influence to the determination that ether is not a security keeps the SEC’s regulatory paws off Ethereum, the blockchain platform which Simpson Thacher supports as a member of the Ethereum Enterprise Alliance. Simpson Thatcher also handled the $100 million IPO of Canaan, the Chinese maker of machines used to mine cryptocurrency. Netburn’s order should bring much-needed transparency to the case. Gary Gensler, slated to be confirmed as the next SEC chairman, will take the helm when China is racing ahead with a closed-ledger digital currency threatening to unseat the dollar a leading medium of global exchange. It was extremely shortsighted of the SEC to handicap Ripple at a time when the US needs every American crypto leader on board to compete with China. Moreover, the case seems to reveal that former SEC leaders put their personal gain above the well-being of the nation. When the agency repeatedly claims in filings and hearings that “the SEC is not on trial here”, it is almost certain that the opposite is true." rom: Some may remember my text back in Dec2020, that the SEC case very much resembles a (business) war of control over some lucrative resource. Well, I've been finding more and more evidence, that SEC was indeed both a weapon and a mercenary in the case of Ripple. Beginning with Jay Claytonz and his vices carrier moves immediately after leaving SEC, there appears new evidence by the week. It will not take years to gather the big pic.
  7. That was very strategic from you. Quite a few folks hearts could have stopped. Nevertheless, this is the la futura I intend for myself – cash out at XRP=10.
  8. I did. I filled that form today. Whatever mistakes Ripple did to XRP, those just pale in comparison to SEC attack.
  9. T is a shady business, there I agree w you 100%. My own critical remarks begun to appear ~ 1 yr ago. I particularly analysed market strategies of USDT v.s. XRP. They have really cutting edge market strategists, which XRP are missing (and it shows). And I cannot deny USDT's amazing utility. My conclusion: that shady USDT is THE competitor to XRP in the area of Ripple's activities (and to other coins in shady dealings), but SEC is going after R. Much like looking for lost keys under the streetlight, instead of looking, where you may have lost them.
  10. Forbes magaz is thinking along the same lines. Some spectacular sentences: "The case represents a significant regulatory overreach", "Such turf grabbing is a classic symptom of regulatory obsolescence...". https://www.forbes.com/sites/roslynlayton/2021/12/29/sec-v-ripple-the-cryptocurrency-trial-of-the-century/?sh=72e4adc75417
  11. Thanks! He seems to be competent in law and start-up strategies. Liked his point by point responses to SEC doc. Building a start-up is very different from doing bureaucracy. I had the impression and @Pablo just made it stronger, that SEC bent the truth by picking pieces out of context. Also I decided to share another document, that shines still more light on the whole SEC "thing". This doc predates SEC action. https://chinatechthreat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Senate-Policy-Letter-Cryptocurrencies-and-the-Next-SEC-Chair.pdf
  12. Thank you for reading the link! Yes, it is it. An academic analysis by former SEC officials of SEC document. Good for understanding and positive for XRP – currency case. Should calm panicking minds, if they read such papers. Why I used the word "shelling" – because it fits business wars, if they spill into open. – to aggressively bombard with arguments the public and the opponents with the intention of "changing public's perception", "gaining advantage", <you name it>.
  13. Please excuse my going off-topic, but this is worth mentioning and, possibly, reading. Found this on reddit. In brief – big guns beginning shelling from the Ripple's side (Ripple owner side). It supports my hypothesis, that we are witnessing a war of business groups over the control of a certain technology/market/whatever. Ugly, as it is, but fairly normal. And, in general, take-over battles are good for asset prices. https://www.iflr.com/article/b1m2pm9g4n65mk/cryptocurrencies-and-us-securities-laws-beyond-bitcoin-and-ether?fbclid=IwAR2jh7GAwBYdyP1aFRpCDaF-MB9h3YKOgoikkMIa7wv4sBpepktVndNA7mw Happy holidays!
  14. Cheers to everyone, who held through this SEC affair! I largely missed out on the fuss due to other duties. Got very surprised, when setting up a sell order at 0,60 and receiving a buy signal at 0,25 instead. But XRP price graph for the last 24 hours is a clear sign, that not very many got carried away by this PR stunt.
  15. Just finished reading SEC filing and Ripple's first response. SEC have invested thousands of hours to reverse engineer Ripple's strategy and in doing so brought to light quite a pile something. Part of it we did know. What is certain, however, is this trio: – business is about not telling the whole truth, – politics is about not telling the whole truth and bending the rest of it, – behind every move in politics stands business. Correct me, if SEC is not "politics". Therefore and most likely behind this SEC filing stand some large business interests. These are the first shots exchanged in an economic war. I take it as a confirmation, that Ripple have dented the canvas of reality enough to become a craved asset for some yet unnamed group. Luckily, the backers of R seem to be as big. To cut the long story, I expect a protracted showdown, that results in nothing.
  16. Best exchanges already have it for users. E.g. Bitstamp has automatic Spark airdrop signup with all wallets holding XRP.
  17. If you check the utility scan, it is obvious, ODL volumes are slowly climbing, over 6 mill USD/day as of yesterday. So there is a hint of supporting evidence, that the faith of XRP may be slowly changing.
  18. With all my respect, price is a trailing indicator, to use your slang. XRP does not float in a vacuum. Besides company competition in blockchain "industry" there is ongoing coin (strategy) competition – an everyman-for-themselves-war for the available money. Tether is currently winning it over any coin and over XRP obviously too. I warned about USDT strategic attack on TOP3 back in March 2020. ETH recent activity correlates to that perceived threat from USDT. ETH folks are fighting for their TOP2 place and their future in general. I could list several other coin projects, that used USDT attack as an impulse to become demonstrably more active since began. What's Ripple done and is doing about XRP competitiveness that affected / should affect XRP price performance relative to other coins? I know of only one recent action.
  19. Oh, familiar faces, to say politely. Early on on XRPChat I was reading quite a lot every day and followed 17 (seventeen) persons, incl. one of those, who [liked] your response. Fast forward to today –only following 1 (one) person and glancing over headlines about every other week. That's how little value I find in messages of your and yours, to say politely.
  20. Boy, weren't those youth taken for a ride and disillusioned!? This answers why XRP is where it is – in a position of a cowboy nicknamed the Invincible Joe – not because he was indeed invincible, but because not a single person, not even eager-women-earning-in-the-streets, had any interest in him. Entirely Ripple's strategy. As to new money – nearest new money may be from oil country elites again, but, contrary to autumn 2017, there is no indication they are at all considering XRP to park their funds.
  21. Fiat backed coins take one shaving upon converting fiat to coin and another one, when converting back to fiat. Between these two conversions the coin is as good as cash in hand. Is that good enough motivation? Actually there are two types of stable coins: a) coins backed by something, e.g. gold, fiat, foodstamps are a good example of this type; b) coins of the type of "invincible Joe", i.e. stable by their use or lack thereof.
  22. I still hold most of "it" in XRP, but changed some part to BNB this winter. Was considering BTC initially, but then decided for BNB use case. Been thinking since – what if Ripple was a Chinoise company?
  23. Thanks for your thoughtful response! Of course XRP swings with BTC like IDK what, like every other crypto. But BTC cannot be a stablecoin in the near future, because there are too many significant parties interested in its price growing AND capable of initiating market reactions. BTC price just cannot stabilise until such parties leave the market. On the other hand, Ripple has told countless times, that they are interested in XRP price growing, but they are not doing anything to promote this directly in the market. And there is no one else around. Basically Ripple are interested to find out market's long term opinion on the price, which is based on utility and community sentiment. Notice, I did not write market sentiment (FOMO). So we have an actual un-backed stablecoin candidate. And one more thing: "Share of voice = share of mind". Ripple is finally building its share of voice. I wish them the best in this. So, sooner or later XRP will break free.
  24. XRP seems to be slowly morphing into a kind of stable coin as, besides following the BTC price moves, there appears to be correlation forming between XRP and some stable coins. I would say that it may be a blessing in disguise, as XRP is not backed by anything, except its utility (hope of utility at this time, which is essentially zero), but still it's resistant and stable. I would prefer XRP to be a stable and slow-growing asset over it being a swinger. That stability would be the best way of de-coupling from BTC and the market in general. BUT, the relative stability of XRP also describes one condition specific to XRP and not characteristic to other cryptos. There are no significant parties interested in XRP price rising, instead there are significant parties interested in XRP price discovery. I was fuming about this for quite some time, now I take this condition, that helps keeping stability, as a silver lining to the cloud, for I can venture from XRP into speculative things and then return, knowing that XRP is still there.
  25. rom

    Hi! I'm Bob

    Thanks, Bob, for this! You are the first Ripple or exRipple to respond honestly about rebalancing problem. Conceptually Ripple itself hasn't gone that far away from nostro-vostro-intro-outtro accounts, that they seemingly want to free-up. What is their ultimate solution, if there is any known to you? Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.