Jump to content

Danny

Member
  • Content Count

    505
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Danny

  • Rank
    Advanced

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Professional crypto traders worldwide make huge profits based on their TA.
  2. https://www.cryptopolitan.com/fxcoin-partners-sbi-to-launch-a-volatility/
  3. In your initial post in this thread you did not distinguish any type of CBDC, you put all CBDCs on one big heap and said bridging them is "the worst and most absurd use case" you had ever heard. Now you're narrowing it down to a very specific type of CBDC that may theoretically not need bridging, but it's a type of CBDC that does not exist.
  4. Even if you had a 'non tokenized money' version of a CBDC, one that doesn't need to be backed by fiat, it would still equal fiat money and fiat money can and will be inflated by banks and governments. History has shown that.
  5. I think we shouldn't forget CBDCs aren't assets, they're liabilities, because they're backed by fiat. So you're transferring liabilities, not value. Ripple is trying to create an internet of value, not an internet of liabilities. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, CBDCs do not solve the Triffin dilemma (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triffin_dilemma).
  6. That particular XML file has been deleted. It may be related to https://ripple.com/matchmaking/organizations/?destination_country=AO&dir=receiver&order=asc&orderby=title
  7. A summary report of the European Commission says that the main barriers to operating truly cross-border and calling for further harmonisation are duplication in anti-money laundering requirements across member states, diverging know-your-customer applications, discrepancies in PSD2 transpositions, as well as differences in national consumer protection, consumer credit, and insolvency rules, and tax rules for cross-border services (source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/2020-digital-finance-strategy-consultation-summary-of-responses_en.pdf).
  8. @CryptoEri drew my attention to this interesting video. "They are a store of value just like Bitcoin is, obviously, but they're the clear winner currently in that cross-border space, the clear winner. They could be the Netscape of the world or they could continue to be Google from day 1 to where they are today."
  9. Imagine for a moment you're a central bank and Accenture is your tech delivery partner for domestic payments. Wouldn't it make perfect sense to ALSO have Accenture as your tech delivery partner for cross-border payments? Ps. I read somewhere that Bank of Canada also works with Accenture.
  10. FCA has confirmed XRP is not a security, SEC hasn't. However, since both companies have signed cooperation arrangements reaffirming their commitment to continue close cooperation in March 2019, I'm convinced it's impossible for the SEC to view XRP differently.
  11. I initially thought Steve Wynn is a pseudonym (I kept asking myself 'did Steve Wynn?'), but it could be Steve Alan Wynn, founder of Wynn Resorts and estimated by Forbes to have a net worth of $2.4 billion in 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wynn I think it's him, but I'll check.
  12. I like his simplistic view. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnnavin/2020/07/12/xrp-is-the-crypto-to-watch-says-vegas-blackjack-pro/
  13. @LetHerRip I'm just curious, are you an investor?
  14. And those who do find the issue of low speed and high fees annoying, you can suggest to send BTC using the XRP ledger
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.