Jump to content

Trickery

Gold Member
  • Posts

    4,012
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from RikkiTikki_is_Back in John E Deaton - CryptoLaw - connecting the dots - Hinman is praying the SEC conceals everything Ripple wants in discovery.   
    Yeah I was actually talking about a settlement on fair notice.
  2. Like
    Trickery reacted to HAL1000 in John E Deaton - CryptoLaw - connecting the dots - Hinman is praying the SEC conceals everything Ripple wants in discovery.   
    Is the SEC Hiding Evidence that Hinman Colluded to Boost Ether?
    If it weren’t for the lawsuit the SEC filed against Ripple, we might not have ever glimpsed how crooked William Hinman turned out to be as Director of Corporation Finance. A federal judge has ordered the SEC several times to produce the documents and external communications around Hinman’s June 14, 2018 speech where he declared that ether is not a security.
    The SEC is desperately fighting not to produce them, because everyone knows that if they fully comply with the order, their case will fall apart.
    It’s a happy coincidence for Hinman that the seeds of the SEC’s defeat are in those documents and they are fighting tooth-and-nail to conceal them. It’s because if all the emails, meeting records and staff notes are made public, they will also revealwith whom Hinman consulted - and colluded - to draft, edit and finalize that 2018 speech, after which the price of Ether has increased by a face-melting 600% to date.
    From all indications seen in the redacted Hinman deposition and the filings around the fight to conceal it, the evidence that the SEC is hiding will reveal the following:
    • Proof that Hinman consulted with top leaders of the Ethereum Foundation and private market participants heavily invested in ether before the speech.
    • All the entities and individuals, inside and outside the SEC, who knew about and/or participated in editing the speech, including market participants with substantial investments or financial interests in ether. Court filings indicate at least 63 SEC emails where versions of the speech were attached.
    • More clues on how material non-public information about the contents of the speech apparently made its way to Coinbase, as they listed Ethereum Classic on their exchange three days before Hinman made the speech.
    • A more complete list of Hinman’s clients at Simpson Thacher, including those who directly profited from the impact of Hinman’s speech.
    All of this will help us connect the dots with what we’ve already documented.
    Since 2017, Simpson Thacher has been a member of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, a community of businesses and organizations pushing for the widespread adoption of ether.Hinman joined the SEC in 2017.
    Simpson Thacher paid Hinman millions of dollars all throughout his service at the SEC, and that Simpson Thacher’s China office is managed by a Chinese Communist Party member who steers enormous contracts to the firm from CCP-managed tech companies.
    Hinman and Jay Clayton brought Alibaba public in 2014, making enormous sums of money in the process. It cemented their relationship, made them and their law partners incredibly rich. The CCP’s key asset embedded in Simpson Thacher’ssenior management, Celia Lam, has steered multi-billion dollar deals to the firm as it issued millions in annual payments to Hinman at the SEC, including the $14 billion equity financing of Alipay the same year as Hinman’s speech.
    Nothing on Wall Street happens by chance, and no one gets their name on the biggest IPO in history without promising a few favors, especially when it is for a Chinese Communist Party-controlled tech giant.
    Clayton and Hinman’s tenure at the SEC coincided with crypto’s emergence into mainstream finance. The two were smart enough to realize that they could take advantage of that to leverage public ignorance and the absence of regulatory frameworks to pick winners and losers.
    And we already know, from all the evidence already public, that is exactly what they did
    The evidence being concealed by the SEC cannot be legally destroyed, as they are federal government documents subject to records retention laws. We knew all along they existed. The Ripple lawsuit simply helped us know more about them.
    We intend to use every means at our disposal to get them, and publish them here.
    Stay tuned.
    The film is going to be amazing, I can't wait.
  3. Haha
    Trickery reacted to The_HODLing_Unicorn in Charting the course of XRP   
    see y'all at 1.80$ in a few hours
  4. Haha
    Trickery reacted to brianwalden in F-assets will increase the coin supply   
    Ok Boomer, let's see who's

    Your entire rant is based on not looking at the date of my comment. On the date I posted it we did not have confirmation, merely speculation, that you'd be able to earn Flare rewards while your funds were in a Dapp. Here's what I knew at the time. You interviewed the Trustline guy (big brain, I really like him, but terrible public speaker) on some dude's show and asked him about still earning rewards while putting funds into the probity vault. He said he would look into it. I think he later confirmed by tweet that he was working with Flare to see if there way a to do it. In fact, Trustline didn't even confirm that Probity vault users would earn spark rewards until today!
    On May 19 - two days after I wrote my "intellectually lazy" comment - we got a tweet directly from Flare that Dapps should pay rewards back that they earn on behalf of their users.
    This actually confirms the premise of my comment. That the rewards would go to the wallet holding the FLR/F-asset. And we can infer by the use of "should" that there is no protocol-level mechanism forcing Dapps to pay the rewards. I'm sure Flare's "should" carries a lot of weight, but either you have decentralized network or you don't. And if have have a decentralized network, then Flare can't tell Dapps what to do. While I agree with you that we can now say that Trustline and Flare Finance will give members Flare rewards, we cannot turn that into an absolute statement about every Dapp on the network.
    I have no problem being shown that I'm wrong and correcting myself. If you'll look at the pinned post in this very group explaining the various opportunities on the Flare Network that this intellectually lazy, XRP-maxi, FUDster inexplicably wrote, you'll see that I updated it as new information came in and thanked the people who informed me. This is a speculative thread and the way rewards work is only a tangent within it, I felt it was better to leave the comment unedited to record what we were actually thinking at the time.
    I'll make a deal with you. If you can prove me wrong about either of my two points [1) That none of this was officially confirmed until after my comment was made, or 2) When your tokens are in a DeFi app, the Flare Network pays them the rewards because the tokens are in their wallets], I'll get a Patreon subscription.
    You messed up, Mickey Boy. Sun Tzu says to know yourself and know your enemy. I know myself and I know a lot more about you than you do about me. You chose the wrong target. So now that we've covered the general situation, let's go comment by comment.
    Indeed.
    I don't see where my comment said anything about Flare's innovations. Have you got shellshock from battling the Twitter trolls or something.
    You are spreading inaccuracies and blatantly misleading information. I'm the only one who can feel my own feels, and I am not the least bit embarrassed.
    This is dishonest and unmanly rhetoric. Maybe you're a pedophile. See how unfair that is. If you want to make a claim about me, make it so it can be verified as true or false. Cut the wishy washy bovine excrement.
    Are you an idiot or just intellectually dishonest? You can't call me a maxi and then be a FLR supremacist. My personal feelings about Flare and FLR are irrelevant, but there is no absolutely superior crypto asset. It's all relative to what you're trying to accomplish with it.
    I don't try to get inside your head, don't try to get inside mine. You're wrong about my assumptions.
    All three claims here are false and can be easily proven false by reading anything I've written in this club.
    The truth was highly speculated about. As someone who read the white papers and watched the interviews, I saw that the possibility to earn Flare rewards while using DeFi services was there, but the actual black and white confirmation that it would be the case was a dog that hadn't barked. We didn't know and couldn't know until confirmed by the individual DeFi services, which didn't happen until May 19th (FF) and 21st (Trustline). The only reason we will be receiving them is because the apps choose to pass them onto us. When they hold the tokens, they earn the rewards.
    Hey man, maybe the e-celeb life is starting to get to you. You might want to thinking about stepping away from the keyboard and taking a little social media break. I think it's causing you to lash out at innocent people.
    Oh the irony.

     
    Ok tough guy. Look, I recommend your work, but just the other day I was explaining to a confused friend how PattyXRP is a dude, not a chick. You're not gonna get those little things out of me anymore after a stunt like this.
  5. Haha
    Trickery reacted to xrp-pat in F-assets will increase the coin supply   
    Blimey. 
  6. Haha
    Trickery reacted to FOOD in Is Galgitron Elon Musk?   
    Well, have you ever seen the two of them in the same room?  
    My theory is that this is indeed possible.  And if so, we are going to want to be on the heels of our feet cuz if he pulled that off, then the next step is obvious...
    to promote XLM.... using XRP as a ploy to learn everthing about XLM would give him exactly what he needs to luminate stellularity....
    So, you ask.... what are you talking about?   Believe me, I am right there with you....
    I think my point is that if these two people are the same person, would you really promote Doge coin?  Actually, you might... let me rephrase...
    nevermind.
     
    I really hope that clears things up!
    LOve, 
    foOD
     
  7. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from cryptoxrp in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    No that is factually incorrect, BG has never promised you anything, you've fomo'd on his words and been left disappointed, the only promises made were by you to you.
  8. Haha
    Trickery got a reaction from ZeeperCreeper in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    You promised not to visit! 
  9. Haha
    Trickery got a reaction from aavkk in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    You promised not to visit! 
  10. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from RikkiTikki_is_Back in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    Expectations are not promises, the expectations were created in your own mind because that's what you wanted to hear, I was guilty of it myself for a while until I saw it for what it was, Hype. You can blame BG till the cows come home but the only one responsible for your feelings is you. 
  11. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from RikkiTikki_is_Back in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    It has nothing to do with semantics, you took his words as some sort of gospel without ever considering the context and his position as COO of Ripple, don't attack us for pointing out your own stupidity.
  12. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from mistatee2000 in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    Not a promise.
  13. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from Danny in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    Not a promise.
  14. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from 7strings in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    Expectations are not promises, the expectations were created in your own mind because that's what you wanted to hear, I was guilty of it myself for a while until I saw it for what it was, Hype. You can blame BG till the cows come home but the only one responsible for your feelings is you. 
  15. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from WarChest in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    No that is factually incorrect, BG has never promised you anything, you've fomo'd on his words and been left disappointed, the only promises made were by you to you.
  16. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from solid102 in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    Expectations are not promises, the expectations were created in your own mind because that's what you wanted to hear, I was guilty of it myself for a while until I saw it for what it was, Hype. You can blame BG till the cows come home but the only one responsible for your feelings is you. 
  17. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from solid102 in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    It has nothing to do with semantics, you took his words as some sort of gospel without ever considering the context and his position as COO of Ripple, don't attack us for pointing out your own stupidity.
  18. Thanks
    Trickery got a reaction from solid102 in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    No that is factually incorrect, BG has never promised you anything, you've fomo'd on his words and been left disappointed, the only promises made were by you to you.
  19. Haha
    Trickery got a reaction from solid102 in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    You promised not to visit! 
  20. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from BillyOckham in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    Expectations are not promises, the expectations were created in your own mind because that's what you wanted to hear, I was guilty of it myself for a while until I saw it for what it was, Hype. You can blame BG till the cows come home but the only one responsible for your feelings is you. 
  21. Like
    Trickery got a reaction from BillyOckham in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    It has nothing to do with semantics, you took his words as some sort of gospel without ever considering the context and his position as COO of Ripple, don't attack us for pointing out your own stupidity.
  22. Thanks
    Trickery got a reaction from Caracappa in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    No that is factually incorrect, BG has never promised you anything, you've fomo'd on his words and been left disappointed, the only promises made were by you to you.
  23. Like
    Trickery reacted to BillyOckham in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    Perhaps English is not your native language.  That is not even remotely a promise.  It’s a statement of confidence.  
     
    Have you so little life experience that you’ve not seen someone be wrong about something they were confident of?
     
    Seriously guys...   you will be disappointed all your life if every statement of confidence by someone is taken by you as a “promise”.
  24. Haha
    Trickery got a reaction from Dorth-Vader in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    You promised not to visit! 
  25. Haha
    Trickery got a reaction from 7strings in Our Statement on Partnering with MoneyGram   
    You promised not to visit! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.