Jump to content

Ripple-Stiltskin

Gold Member
  • Content Count

    5,746
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Ripple-Stiltskin

  1. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    Sure you do, lol. Keeping this for the record. One of your best jokes until now.
  2. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    Last post on you, before you get a hotseat on my ignore list: FUDSters usually are takers: And so are you.
  3. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    Wow, editing after being already quoted. Nice. Salty too. Frustrated much?
  4. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    No, I’m sure that was you. You said that all Economists on the board were wrong, and that only the supply counts regarding XRP’s price . Want to see your post? You know nothing about economics, never saw a single content post on that subject from you , only FUD.
  5. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    Ofcourse I did, it’s written above the Apple report. I analyse reports for a living, lol. Just wondered if the denomination of the Exim’s report was in single £ or maybe thousands/millions. But yes, even in single £ is a good start for Ripple, onboarding a small bank doesn’t make it less impressive. We knew the next FUD would be “ yeah, but it’s a small bank”. And that it would be you and your little friends. Weren’t you the Most Master of Economics who said that demand doesn’t matter and that it’s only supply side that counts? Never saw you again after this high school mistake. And changed your name when you were at risk being banned?
  6. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    I know, that’s why I posted it. Maybe Exim’s sheet isn’t just single £....
  7. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    Read previous post again. And again. And again.
  8. Ripple-Stiltskin

    Euro exim bank

    Bigger than Apple! ( with only 300k, how is that possible???? Noob in analysing reports are you?)
  9. Is this a scam from Norton? ( click on the link?). Lol.
  10. There are chances that Ripple might effectively tie up with Apple in 2019 which implies that the value of Ripple will rise essentially. ????? Yes, Ripple can, possibly, maybe, it’s not unthinkable, who knows , if, imagine, one can dream of, wouldn’t it be nice.....
  11. Ripple-Stiltskin

    40+ Companies using, accepting or testing XRP

    Was this before or after you heavily used your old pipe?
  12. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    If only there was an asset to swap all these currencies within seconds against minimal costs....
  13. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    Agreed with your post. Depends on ones starting or default position: mine is € because I live in the EU, getting my wage in € and all goods have to be bought with €. That’s why definitions of “ base” , “ money” etc depends on your position/perspective.
  14. Ripple-Stiltskin

    XRapid ONLY uses XRP as counter currency

    No, this is nonsense. Making predictions or statements about a future state of a system, even “ fact-based” predictions, lays the burden of proof on the “ prophet” and not the ones he’s adressing. Anyway: macro economics is about complex systems, even if something has played out in the past, if just one parameter has changed ( and believe me: many parameters are different now than in 2008) the outcome can be 100% different. Predictions based on Macro Modelling isn’t science : falsification isn’t possible until the actual event happens and even reconstruction ( to repeat the “ experiment”) is impossible. Educated guesses, that’s what they are.
  15. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    Let’s call it “ fiat” then.
  16. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    Agreed on what you said earlier: narrowing definitions helps to clearify/ purify ( heated) discussions, as I stated also. It helps that fiat is maybe less subjective than “ money”, but I’m afraid this still isn’t enough for some ongoing discussions about it ( in which I don’t participate atm). Concerning Goofy being a cow: DS said that absence of proof, is in fact proof of absence ( of Goofy being a cow that is). Other discussion that is. Last: I don’t speak with spokesmen, I’m going for the real deal.
  17. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    Fair enough. I’ll rephrase it ( but I’ve said it 2 or 3 times already, it just went straight over your head I guess): It’s not up to you to end discussions between members on the board, especially discussions in which you don’t participate actively. Clear enough? If not: PM me for further explanation.
  18. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    Now you’re the spokesman of the whole board? Maybe it’s you that needs to PM more ( or add something of value to the discussion. As of now we, yes the whole board, don’t see any real contribution in your posts in this thread) .
  19. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    With all due respect: are you his spokesman? Can I just have a discussion with an individual member, without others judging if there’s a reason to discuss that level of detail? I leave it up to him to decide that, and not to you.
  20. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    Agreed, but his statement was that money is subjective and fiat is objective.
  21. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    I’ll summarise what I tried to say: - I saw the ( heated) discussions between P3t3RIS and Brownbear , in this and other threads - I notice that many discussions on the board get heated and escalate into namecalling - imo that’s because they often talk about different things and from different perspectives - so it’s important that all parties in a discussion agree on the basics ( main definitions) of the subject - the discussion about “ base” , “ fiat” , “ money” etc is just an example. - imo there are no “objective” or “ subjective” definitions. Just that every definition has a certain grade of acceptance. If you want to call a definition with a > 50% acceptance ( how does one measure that?) an “ objective” definition, fine by me. ( but I can challenge that: why > 50% and not > 90%?) - economics isn’t science. And even in Physics ( a science) not all things are absolut ( objective)> Einstein’s relativity. So yeah, your answer was a bit offensive and no, I’m not losing the discussion nor do I want to save my face. I like arguments and discussing, but I only state things that I’m convinced of. Until I’m proven wrong. And still happy then. note: his argument was that “ fiat” is a (100%?) objective term.
  22. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    Lol, must have been that good old Freud. He’s harassing me 24/7 lately.
  23. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    You’re the Most Master of arguments. But wrong.
  24. Ripple-Stiltskin

    xRapid execution order confirmed by David Schwarz

    We’re discussing wether the term “ money” is more subjective than the term “ fiat”. ( or rather that fiat isn’t subjective) Have you something valuable to add to this discussion?
×