Jump to content

Xi195

Bronze Contributor
  • Content count

    794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Xi195 last won the day on April 24

Xi195 had the most liked content!

5 Followers

About Xi195

  • Rank
    Veteran Member
  1. Expect news from Google soon

    Amazon purchased a number of crypto related domains recently. CNBC article on it here: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/01/amazon-buys-crypto-domains-bitcoin-ethereum.html Seems like someone thought it would be a good idea to snag amazonxrp.com as a result.
  2. I don't remember whose idea it was, but they should let Jed sell his XRP directly to R3. He gets instant, 100% liquidity and R3 gets their XRP. Two birds, one stone. Unfortunately, things often aren't that simple.
  3. Ripple on BrightTalk

    Agreed. I remember the test well. It would be a significant revelation IMO if they were explicitly testing/handling XRP. I'm fairly confident based on his response that they were. Would be big news.
  4. Ripple on BrightTalk

    The article makes no mention of XRP. The "knock" on XRP if you will, is that Ripple doesn't require it (which is true but misleading). If the BoE tested XRP, that would be a clear indicator of the momentum Ripple has with XRP adoption.
  5. Ripple on BrightTalk

    The question about XRP and regulation at 54:00 was the most interesting XRP related moment for me. When asked what the hurdles to XRP adoption are, Marcus references the Bank of England proof of concept. Is he saying the Bank of England tested XRP?
  6. I answered the second portion of the question: "Is it easy?". Off the top of my head, I don't have a simple or well-informed answer for the first. As anecdotal evidence though, consider the fact that after years of effort, the best C++ team in fintech, around 200 employees, PoC's with many of the world's top central banks, and over $90M raised from the best VC's and institutions in the industry, Ripple is just starting to find momentum with institutional adoption. Doesn't sound easy to me.
  7. No. Ripple has been working on this for years. With 100 active (announced) customers, they are light years ahead of the competition.
  8. Transparency meaning clear visibility of fees prior to payment and predictable settlement timing. That's at least the transparency I first think of.
  9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomgroenfeldt/2017/11/07/big-corporate-payers-want-more-information-greater-transparency/#1b102ecd7910 If banks want transparency, Ripple will give it to them.
  10. Gatehub receiving 'strike-off' notice

    This is true. Too bad their exchange is a nightmare. I've always been a supporter of GateHub. Disclosing a hack months after the fact and pathetically low quality and inconsistent communication, coupled with a fleeing technical team, gives me zero confidence in GateHub. I'll keep an eye on them as they rebuild, and wish them all the best, but I won't be using their product for now.
  11. I'd say it's a pretty solid team, particularly with Jihan on board. Interesting that bitmain no longer accepts BTC. Twitter is far too addicting for someone with my propensity for blockchain distractions and half-baked thoughts by the way. Here's to hoping I get this under control.
  12. That one was a good read. Those scenarios are too simple though, which he admits. Part 2 will be interesting to read. And another perspective for the perpetually curious:
  13. He should embrace the meme Greg Maxwell. Way cooler (even has more followers). https://twitter.com/nullc_?lang=en
  14. That sounds plausible. Do you have a link? Curious about the discussion on this.. 1 Thanks for sharing @TiffanyHayden This scenario makes more sense to me than any other. What I think may happen is that while the process above will destroy the value of 1X, 2X will never transfer the full value of the 1X chain. If that happens, BCH stands to be the primary benefactor. @jn_r Looks like this was originally written by Greg Maxwell here:
  15. why blockchain wont fix payments

    The problems start before you read a word. If you designed a meme website called "bankingtech", it would look as backward as this one.
×