Jump to content

princesultan

Member
  • Content Count

    513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by princesultan

  1. Let's assume this was true (though it highly likely is not) , I don't thick this would be a good thing for xrp
  2. There’s actually a thread for this? I guess this forum really has gone to sh*t.
  3. I'd bet on it being legit. Alex is one of the better ones out there. He's called out a ton of shady stuff in the past. That being said, I doubt BoA would be on ODL, so we can expect no price appreciation
  4. Why is this even surprising ? It's a high growth tech startup. None of them make profits... You know how long it took Amazon to have a profitable year? 12 years. /endthread
  5. Thanks for sharing and if true I retract my previous comments in this thread.
  6. This post makes no sense. MGI received 8.9m. This is not subject to r&d credits since they are receiving the money. For ripple, whether or not MGI classifies the 8.9m received as a revenue of negative/contra expense makes no difference for ripple being able to potentially claim these expenditures for r&d credits. Bottom line: ripple gave 8.9m to MGI likely because ODL wasn’t efficient and resulted in costs.
  7. Contra expense is a financial statement classification. Instead of classifying the 8.9m as revenues, they reduced the related revenue account by 8.9m. It's purely classification. The point is, MGI received 8.9m from ripple last quarter. Whether it was classified as revenue or a reduction of their expenses makes no difference to us. We should be concerned about the fact that ripple had to pay them money, likely because ODL resulted in efficiencies that cost MGI money
  8. The main point here is that ripple actually paid MoneyGram $8.9m. They shouldn't be paying money if the solution is working. Couple that with the fact that ripple bought a 10% stake in MGI at an above market price just to get their foot in the door. Ya... Real good...
  9. Brad said that last week xrp was part of 7% of all Mexican peso flows (something along those lines). I wondered if the price increase had anything to do with that...
  10. It's gotten to the point where I don't even listen to his interviews anymore.
  11. My sense is that this is not good for xrp, but then again I don't know enough about this kinda stuff.
  12. I’ve read enough of these reports by now. All I gotta say is... meh.
  13. You’ve been here since 2015 and you actually have to ask if it’s legit?
  14. hmmm, didn't see this coming.... i'm curious why they would raise money rather than just sell xrp.
  15. this video proves one thing: we are still years away from anything substantial happening
  16. imagine if Arthur b was actually satoshi? We would see some btc maxi heads explode!
  17. Contrast how this CEO is talking compared to Western Union's. One gets the future, the other doesn't.
  18. Moneygram confirms that right now 10% of their Mexican Peso volume is going through XRP. That's actually significant.
  19. Just read it. Basically they are trying to convince the central bank to change their laws around to accommodate virtual currencies. Neither good nor bad to be honest. With all the new hires made in regulation, it seems that this will literally be Ripple's goal over the next few years: convince government's to change their laws. We're several years off still...
  20. Pretty please let it be true (and that they were discussing xrp in it)
×
×
  • Create New...