Jump to content

Dogowner5

Silver Member
  • Content Count

    1,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Dogowner5 last won the day on September 12

Dogowner5 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Dogowner5

  • Rank
    Veteran

Recent Profile Visitors

726 profile views
  1. Sure. Which words would you like expunged from my vocabulary? Btw... not angry at all. Just pointing out your error. Ah. Ok. No point in discussing your beliefs then. I will just stick to the Ripple and XRPL related matters. So you are still comfortable with bold red lies in your post? No need to adjust or amend? Fair enough. You do you.
  2. No. You posted an article, then made a big deal via a bold red highlight about something that wasn’t true. Something that, along with all the other lies in the article, is easily fact checked. If it seemed like new information to you (it wasn’t, it was a bunch of crap) then you should have at the least used some caution in posting it. Perhaps an editorial comment or question like “Could this be true?” Perhaps education these days is failing to teach people how to be analytical which seems a shame. For instance. Saying “how do I know Ripple is telling the truth?” and
  3. It wasted my time. It wasted anyone’s that read it. Guys! I just got some new information, apparently the world is run by Lizard people who wear human skin suits and have a secret base on the far side of the moon! I got that off a website... will post the link as soon as I find it again... If you have a conscience and a brain, then you really should vet information before posting it as fact. Short attention spans and modern day laziness has a lot to answer for...
  4. Also... it’s a silly question since there is no chance Ripple would do that. But hey... whatever...
  5. Nothing would happen. Consensus would still be maintained and the XRPL would continue to settle immutably every three or four seconds.
  6. The real question here is why such patently false ‘information’ is still being spread about? That article has false statements every paragraph. I was going to show them all but cbf. Heres two just to shut up the ‘ah, couldn’t actually prove any eh?’ crowd: 45.04B from 43.02B last year. So a 4.7% rate. The same as the articles number for Etherium. You mean the ones that stopped a year ago? There were an embarrassment of riches in the ‘which false claim to debunk’ department. So, @JJJ2 are you going to retract? And guys... why do thes
  7. Nice idea and implementation on the planner. May I suggest that the ability to remove a card (say, if it’s incorrectly completed) would be a good thing? An X at top right?
  8. Unless I’m mistaken, it would be illegal for BTCMarkets to falsely report XRP volumes. So I don’t think you can be correct in your inference that the volume is increasing but it can’t be seen. The reported XRP trading volume is not increasing so I do not believe ODP volume is increasing in AUD and Mexican Pesos at least. I haven’t looked at other currencies.
  9. I feel inclined to agree that some form of obscuring has been installed. So I suspect that the ODL matching and tracking is now going to be less accurate. But the overall volume cannot be masked and it doesn’t show any growth at all as far as I can see. That is what bothers me about the situation. I’m still confident it will save money and be adopted. I just don’t think it’s getting much traction in the current climate. @JASCoder feels it’s a staged process, and he could be right, but that feels like a overly complex answer when ‘it’s not getting traction right now’ seems m
  10. That could be true. The problem I have with a Ripple enforced clamp idea is that I can’t imagine a reason for doing that. Every project I have ever been a part of there is a lot of pressure to ramp it UP not clamp it down. What would be the bad side of increased ODL XRP volumes? I can’t think of one. And yet I CAN think of reasons why it would be a good thing for ODL. So like all of us observing... I am very puzzled. As you say, time will tell.
  11. Warned after it happened, Strange sort of warning, The story is that ODL is being taken up more and more, that it’s very successfully growing even faster than normal Ripplenet volumes. And yet the XRP volume is NOT growing. If there is any growth there at all it is microscopic. We do know that some clients wanted more privacy on their ODL traffic. So Ripple were looking at ways it could be obfuscated. But unless ODL has a super magic trick up it’s sleeve, it can’t hide from the overall site trading volume indicators. And those indicators have been very disapp
  12. @JASCoder but irrespective of the ODL usage, the OVERALL volume must go up if ODL is actually increasing. That would be shown by the volume indicator at the base of almost all trading charts. On the two I’ve just looked at and shown here there was the sudden drop as treasury batched payments stopped and yet there is no growth in the volume since. So to me there is a massive disconnect between then and now. It looks like ODL at the very least is in a pause.
  13. You can see a similar thing at Bitso the Mexican exchange.
  14. Unless the site is lying and hiding volume, (which I think would break a number of financial regulations in Australia,) then there is clearly no increase in XRP ODL from the Australian side. This is the BTCMarkets chart as of right now. You can see the treasury volume at base of chart on the far left and the non-growing volume ever since. Masking tags, sharding payments etc would not mask the trading volume indicator at the base of this chart. So I don‘t believe that AUD volume is growing at all. I assume it’s similar elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.