Jump to content

vinylwasp

Member
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About vinylwasp

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Occupation
    Nomad
  • Country
    Singapore

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. That makes sense too, assuming Ripple offer rebates for volume on the utilization side as well, the more you use the cheaper it gets.
  2. The interesting thing here is that I don't think it would be the customers of Ripplenet that Ripple would be subsidizing. When you model it out, for any corridor, the customers like MGI make money and use the system because the quoted spread between originating currency and receiving currency over ODL is low. This is dependent on the liquidity providers who are providing those quotes via the FX ticker/s. My assumption has always been that the exchange operate one FX ticker using their open 'market' order book and at least 2 liquidity providers operate another 2 using non-public books (like A + B books/dealing desk in the forex market). The LPs are under a contract with Ripple, not the customer (MGI in this example) or the exchange, so if there's any mechanism to maintain a low FX spread (i.e. create on-demand liquidity/market breadth) through the injection of a subsidy from Ripple its likely to happen there, and to start we know Ripple have in some cases loaned these LPs large tranches of XRP to kick start their LP operations, which in itself is a subsidy as it lowers capital costs of holding XRP. Other subsidies may come in the form of discounts for OTC purchases, scaled interest loan payments back to Ripple based on volume and/or spreads, volume and/or spread based rebates, etc.
  3. Ok, so if you have sufficient inside knowledge as a current employee to say that using Ripplenet is outside Westpac's risk tolerance, can you explain why they remain listed as a Ripple customer and more importantly, why they became a member of the Ripplenet Committee and how and why they've maintained their seat at the table from 2015 until now? Quite simply, if Westpac doesn't have a vested interest why bother, and if they're not an active user or in testing/development what value can they bring to the committee, and why would Ripple keep them at the table. The questions and the long term commitment of resources by Westpac and subsequent statements like the one below (which is still on the Ripplenet Committee page today) don't line up with your insider information. If Westpac weren't happy in 2019 (long after Mike left Westpac for CBA), that the comment above still reflected their views, they'd simply ask Ripple to take it down. And from what Mike talks about below at Sibos in 2016 it sounds like Westpac had identified a strong business case, the POC went very well and they were hungry for the first mover advantage. Lack of visible activity does not mean they have no risk appetite. But maybe you're right and Mike was poached by CBA to lead their cross-border payments revolution and the Westpac initiative died when he left, but then why are they still on the Ripplenet Committee in 2019? Mike's now the Executive Director of New Technology Product Initiatives over at CommBank so I wouldn't be surprised if that's exactly what he's doing. Please no-one quote me, this is 100% pure speculation.
  4. Is that an opinion based on what you've read and Westpac's subsequent lack of contrary public announcement or actual inside knowledge from a CTO/CRO perspective? I have no particular view either way as I'd happily let the remittance companies break any aspect of the stranglehold the Big4 oligopoly has on banking in Aus but what is clear is that the RBA CBDC model idea outlined in the AFR article doesn't stack up, nor does the volatility argument given, and neither does the 'banks won't use crypto' argument either as no bank ever needs to own or process any XRP, all it has to do is call an API. You might be right about Westpac's risk appetite, but given the liar loan debacle of 2018 and the money laundering you've cited above, I'd say they've demonstrated they have a fairly large risk appetite if it helps the bottom line, and Ripple can do that while transferring much of the forex, credit, settlement, and operational risk onto a 3rd party while also freeing capital and reducing other associated Nostro costs (e.g. funding) at the same time. Unfortunately for Westpac they'd still be on the hook for KYC, AML and CTF checks. The question that's still not answered is why they're listed as a Ripple customer, and more importantly for me, how and why they're a member of the Ripplenet Committee. I've worked at a few different financials globally, and as you'll know they don't give 3rd parties a seat at a technical/governance forum like the Ripplenet Committee unless those 3rd parties have significant skin in the game. Its not like a board seat you can just buy your way into.
  5. The problem with that 2016 Westpac quote from the AFR is that it makes no sense when examined closely. “If we had a currency created by the RBA – a digital Aussie dollar – that existed on a shared ledger, you don’t need the RBA in the middle saying it has credited one bank and debited another. The transaction is done between two banks directly." Sure, a participant bank in Aus could send a digital asset to another bank in India without clearance via a CCP, but the bank in India in the Westpac statement will only receive $AUD issued on the RBA's DL. Pointless. Which means that this statement is nonsense. "And we would only need to hold a fraction in digital currency of the millions of dollars held in nostro accounts all over the world right now.” The quote, and the rebuttal of DA's (especially one designed as a bridge currency) doesn't deal with the FX/Nostro problem which turns out to be quite tricky to resolve if you're trying to build national W-CBDCs integrated into your national CB RTGS systems: https://waa.ai/O8JU In 3.2.1 (Fig 7) of the pdf, Ripple ODL is playing the role of IntA(local) and IntB(Foreign), and its live now while the other two options have significant problems/barriers and both require some form of Nostro account.
×
×
  • Create New...