Jump to content

Bettergoham

Member
  • Content Count

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bettergoham

  1. I really wish xrp holders wouldn't argue the idea that XRP should have probably been deemed a security up until a year or two ago. The truth is that while "Ripple" didn't create XRP, a lot of founding members absolutely did and sold it to raise funds and drive their company forward. Since then, this has drastically slowed down and almost completely halted. I own XRP because I believe regulators will understand that the benefit XRP can provide to the world will one day outweigh the cost in damages Ripple may have done by selling an unregistered security for a few years. I think the idea that owning XRP doesn't give you a right to earnings in Ripple means XRP is not a security is backwards way of thinking. The truth is at one point it probably should have and Howie's test SHOULD have determined it a security. A lot of powerful and smart people have kept it, thus far, from being deemed so and I am incredibly grateful.
  2. It is a very rough time line but has aligned with what we are seeing in the world today.
  3. Out of all the bullshit timeline predictions and "this should be our year" hoopla, there has only been 1 timeline I give any credence to and it comes from Deloitte. You can look up the video on youtube, just search "deloitte temenos ripple". There is a cut down video of about 6 minutes where the gentleman covers their estimated timeline for blockchain usage back in 2016 and how they see this whole thing playing out. He has basically been spot on, probably because he works for one of if not the largest consultancy groups in the world and has direct bank contacts. He mentions the movements of assets across a blockchain around roughly 2021 and full adoption shortly thereafter.
  4. These comments lead me to believe you don't understand the use case of XRP as a bridge as opposed to thinking it is some currency everyone will accept. Today dollars, yuan, euro are mostly just 1's and 0's on a screen. Countries hold onto these in bank accounts in order to "move" money across borders, XRP removes the holding portion of the moving magic. XRP acts as JIT system for monetary movement. A fiat coin is no different than the system we have today and probably has neutral to positive effects on whether XRP becomes adopted as opposed to negative potential.
  5. They have 3.3B+ trapped in the system. Moneygram's business model is to prefund capital all around the world so their customers can quickly "send money" anywhere. That prefunded capital is "settlement assets".
  6. It will take a while but I can not wait for the day we see a significant reduction in settlement assets. Who knows how much moneygram currently has prefunded for just this corridor on a daily basis. 10MM, 25MM, 50MM? Once 100% of flows for just this one corridor are live on ODL how much of that capital can go to paying down their enormous debt or investing in marketing etc? This is probably why Brad said they are chomping at the bit to open more corridors!
  7. Here is what I do not understand and it may be due to lack of research on my end, how will a central bank digital currency change anything at all from the current system? What will a canadian stable coin and a singapore stable coin due to benefit the current system any more than the current electronic figures on a computer screen + exchange rates? It's not like import/exporters are currently running around handing fiat currencies to each other to settle invoices, they all use exchange rates and move numbers around on a screen. The only difference a "coin" will make is if it is a neutral asset that all governments can agree upon which is priced against individual currencies. Imagine if gold could be moved instantaneously to settle up trade on a monthly/quarterly/annual basis. Governments and businesses wouldn't need to worry about well how liquid is this fiat market, what's the current exchange rate of my currency to that currency, etc. Instead they would exchange their fiat for gold which they would know would be accepted by the other government/business because it is universally priced and accepted due to their being a huge market. This is the role XRP should fill. A universally priced asset that can exchange/bridge all fiats instantaneously, ubiquitously, and extremely cheap.
  8. Yeah, this is your average retail investor hearing the words "settlement" and "liquidity" and assuming it is all a giant conspiracy theory tied to Ripple and a new monetary system. It's those people who will be ****** off 60 days from now when XRP hasn't moved. Ripple is attempting to rebuild the way money moves, this will not happen overnight and there is no switch waiting to be flipped so that XRP moons. It will be a slow and steady process that will be proven through utility and additional profits for organizations.
  9. It's neither. This is a domestic payment system that will have nothing to do with XRP, end of story. May it have something to do with xCurrent or one of the other 15 private sector submissions to the FPTF? Yeah, it could. Could it facilitate XRP transactions 3 years from now as related to cross border payments? Sure, it could be a payment option in the future just as TIPS and other RTGS systems will allow Fintechs to build on top of them.
  10. This has been my exact question, what do they mean? I believe the following: Level playing field on a domestic level entails large banks, small banks, and payments processors having the same ability to compete for business in the market place. Level playing field on a global level still seems to be related to competition between banks but also tied into politics. On this write up https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp180130.htm, you can see Augustin talks about not only similar risk should be similar regulation but also the idea that in the face of crisis these banks should not have the ability to run to their respective governments and ask for a hand out. If U.S. banks fail due to poor risk management the fed shouldn't simply be able to print up more dollars to prop them up. If Chinese businesses fail and the banks in turn do then the government shouldn't be able to print more dollars to prop them hurting other economies. This is where the stretch and tin foil hat come into play, how do you do that? Governments will always protect the large banks and businesses when given the power to do so or they would have a revolt on their hands from the people who are starving/broke. Well maybe, just maybe if everyone shared a universal bridge asset of some sort where all eyes could see plain as day the value of different currencies then the different governments could not cheat one another.
  11. David Schwartz said it best, time is all relative in this space. If you were hoping to get rich overnight then you are in the deepest pits of despair right now. If you understand that Ripple is attempting to replace a cracked foundation that was put in place over 40 years ago, you probably understand we are still a bit early.
  12. 1.) I think Dilip Rao has commented that for a central bank Ripple could probably provide their software for free. I think Ryan Zagone was on the faster payments task force. I think when the FTPF asked for comment Dilip Rao responded explaining how their software would level the playing field and could quickly be set up. 2.) I think Brad Garlinghouse has had one on one conversations with Mnuchin and has presented their software in front of the IMF and Central Banks of the world. 3.) I think Trump has talked to Japan about a level playing field and 80% of Japan's banks run on xCurrent. I don't think it is a stretch to say the Federal Reserve could potentially use xCurrent as a quick setup Real Time Payment System that would level the playing field for large and small company's alike.
  13. What are you guys talking about? @Tyvole made the point "we all did the same research a ******* child could". Let's all take a deep breath and be completely honest here Ripple got a one time pass to sell securities to the masses because they are attempting to change the way value is transferred around the world and should be rewarded significantly if they accomplish that. If you are here holding XRP there are a few things you need to be ok with because it is the literal RISK portion of holding this and any other cryptocurrency: The cryptocurrency is labeled a security and the value goes to zero A majority holder(s) (Ripple) or any whale in any cryptocurrency decides to sell their tokens and move on driving price incredibly low The cryptocurrency fails to gain traction (utility), asset holders lose hope, sell in droves, and the price goes to zero The network/blockchain undergoes a massive attack permanently damaging the trust, investors are scared and sell driving the price to zero EVERY DIGITAL ASSET suffers from 1 or more of these risks at varying degrees, if they didn't there would be no upside return possible. The fact that you all want to focus on one issue is asinine borderline trolling.
  14. Competition, at least in countries that have systems like TIPS. But that is the risk in this whole thing, without it none of us would be sitting here hoping XRP will go to the moon one day.
  15. Exactly, its a proposed ban on derivatives and ETN's based upon cryptoassets for retail investors.
  16. Believe me, I absolutely believe this will pan out, but these are the basic rules of finance that have existed forever. No Risk, No Reward. It is that simple. Government regulation could suddenly squash everything or something better could come along. Yes I invested with cold hard cash, that does not mean my "vision" or "belief" should ever be blind to all possibilities. The truth is this, if there was no chance to fail the market would have already valued XRP much higher than it is today. You, I, and everyone else in this forum would have mortgaged everything we own and exchanged for XRP. That is simply not the case.
  17. This is something I and everyone else here must take into extreme consideration. My other comment on this post meshes perfectly with your comment. Within 1-2 years we should see Moneygrams transactions costs, SG&A costs, and "Settlement Assets" reduced by a huge figures. Moneygram should essentially rise from the dead if XRP and Ripple hold up to what they have said the technology delivers. This star will shine so bright no one should be able to deny it. This is the ultimate showcase and validation opportunity, if it doesn't pan out everyone will have to reconsider their investment.
  18. Moneygram is a PUBLIC entity. This is literally the power move of the decade. Every investor on wall street will know who Ripple/XRP is if they can turn Moneygram around. The ultimate test of the XRP Ledger started yesterday. We will now be able to see the effects XRP can have on a company every single quarter when financials come out. As of Q1 Moneygram has 3.416 Billion dollars locked up as settlement assets. Assuming full adoption over the next year that number should greatly decrease. Look at their expenses on their Q1 P&L, sg&a and transaction cost should decrease within a year. We will have absolute proof if this system works or not and Ripple knows that. They truly believe in the IoV and have set out to prove what XRP can do for a single company. If it works can you even begin to imagine what everyone else in this sector will want to do? Edit: Moneygram has an operating income of 2.7% and Western Union 18.78%. XRP can fix transaction fees for Moneygram, decrease cost for customers, in turn raising revenues. Western Union does about 4x more in revenues on a quarterly basis but they both have nearly identical amounts of "settlment assets" on their balance sheets. Could you imagine if Moneygram can suddenly remove 500M, 1B, 1.5B of this off their settlement assets line and move it to cash? Now they can increase marketing or improve any other aspect of their business.
  19. I have actually wondered about the process of filing for a no action letter. Should it be Ripple who does something like that? Ripple did not issue XRP, if Ripple went away the XRPL would continue, and no promises of return were ever provided with the purchase of XRP. That being said, could another company that utilizes XRP ask for a no action letter such as Coil or Kava Labs? Could the community drop up ONE incredibly well thought request for no action and submit it since we all own XRP and utilize it for quick transfers? If the SEC would only look to Ripple for a request for no action I feel like that defeats the purpose.
  20. Is anyone actually surprised by this? I am incredibly confused by why anyone who is actually looking at crypto as an investment would be so excited about yesterday/todays runup in price. What has changed in the last two weeks that warrants this rise in price? Absolutely nothing is the answer, this is purely FOMO. The day the little yellow line on Galgitron's graph increases is the day I will actually get excited. There is currently one use case for Cryptocurrency, payments for cross-border remittances. This market will comeback down when people are paying $80 in miner's fees to move $500 in bitcoin and those transfers are taking 24+ hours. This pump is a sham, if you believe in the vision of IoV and XRP's roll then nothing matters between now and utility.
  21. Forget to change your account before replying to your own post? Or no one responded to your post so you had to try and bump it for attention?
  22. It's not here yet, however, I strongly believe this is where the world is headed. I firmly believe that sometime in the near future you will be able to leave your home country of Japan with your moneytap app and travel to Spain. You go to pay for a meal and someone at the restaurant will open their soon to exist PagoFX app. You will see the requested payment in euro on their screen, you will see how much yen that totals on your screen, accept a confirmation, and payment will be sent with immediate conversion through XRP in the middle. This **** is the ******* future and I have no idea how people don't see it.
  23. " Although no one of the following characteristics of use or consumption is necessarily determinative, the stronger their presence, the less likely the Howey test is met 1.) Check 2.) Check 3.) Check 4.) Ehh 5.) Check
  24. Hello Everyone, Posts are often made on this forum that reference the large entities who run the correspondent banking system and their resistance to change due to the money they would lose. I have spent some time thinking about this and was wondering if anyone has done estimates regarding the ROI for these banks or has figures available to potentially calculate a gain or loss. The correspondent banking system is a project that the entities involved have invested in with an expectation of return. They "lockup/allocate" cash into nostro/Vostro accounts and provide a service of global transfers for a fee. The question that these banks will end up asking themselves is, can a greater return be expected if we forego this project and allocate the locked up cash to other investments. I think the image several posts on this forum paint is that Ripple and XRP will decimate the correspondent banking system and large banks don't want to lose business, while this is true in nature it opens other opportunities for these banks. The real question is which business do banks stand to earn more from?
×
×
  • Create New...