Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SanHolo

  1. 9 minutes ago, Moonraker said:

    I no longer have access to the Zerpening club. I'm guessing a few other members have also had their membership revoked due to cry babies on this forum.

    No reason was given as to why I no longer have access. 

    If you don't worship XRP or are not a XRP fanboy then beware of the consequences and bullying tactics. Watch what you say in this forum.

    Oh, the irony..

  2. 27 minutes ago, Craig_ said:

    Isn't Codius meant to give unlimited scalability? I'm sure I've heard BG say they can already do 70k per second, but would expect much more when the upgrade kicks in (early 2019, wasnt it?). 

    I thought it was Stefan Thomas who said ILP has unlimited scalability (due to it's light coding), but XRPL has its bottleneck(s).

  3. 5 hours ago, zerocool said:

    they’re actually red, orange, and/or yellow. 

    these colors are stimulating/exciting and are thought to make people more hungry.


    but which one is it?

    yellow > I'm hungry.


    yellow > makes me think of McDonalds > I'm hungry.

  4. 56 minutes ago, 0083041 said:

    How many of the people who are around 30 also drink monster/redbull/rockstar/the like?


    Asking for a friend.

    I’m just passing on the word from a friend of mine, but he’s nearing 30 and still enjoys them. He also has colleages 7+ years older who still drink it. So you’re in the clear. 

  5. 13 minutes ago, zerpian said:

    They might move IOU's but they don't have a counterparty risk free asset like xrp, for which Ripple has been trying to build liquidity for and in which it succeeded to a certain extent.

    That's a big if.

    That’s not my quote ?

  6. 13 minutes ago, Shazam5890 said:

    Isn’t the fact that you can move money in a matter of seconds the factor that eliminates the need for nos/vos accounts or is there another reason to have them?

    I think it’s a mix up of payments vs settlements. If SWIFT was to have a similar solution we would have known by now, cause they would definitely need our $ for liquidity IMO. 

  7. 9 minutes ago, Silkjaer said:

    I know who dangermoose is. But I am not much for namedropping, especially before we find more evidence and connections to the BW exchange accounts.

    I do however consider Hashes an “exchange wallet”, so funding going through this is not easy to track (destination tags etc).

    Figured my assumption doesn’t really hold up. 

    Is there something you can tell about Dangermoose without namedropping?

  8. I Clicked myself a hole with Bithomp. The account Dangermoose was activated by an account that was activated etc etc it ends up with ahbritto. Couldn’t people create their own account without being activated by another or can we assume, whoever DangerMoose is, it has to be an entity of some sorts. Not an individual? 

  • Create New...