Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by scoobysi

  1. I was always waiting for him to come out & be one of the people behind flare or another xrpl project, not happened yet but that maybe sensible if it's trying to appeal to all not just xrp lovers.........
  2. on the subject in hand of the xrpl decentralisation how many non ripple funded companies are building on the xrpl as that seems to be one of the points of the sec case? Wietse would of been an awesome example but also got ripple funding so was trying to recall others?
  3. the title made me laugh which is much needed. Good work
  4. Without knowing the end results, which it's easy to argue about , has anyone got any interesting specific details from the report? If nothing else it gives some interesting info, eg if Investor A or B (can't recall which without going back) is R3 with which the report tries to hang a 30% discount ripple offered (makes for great fud/hate ) & a $240mn total this is interesting as some detail of how the previous out of court agreement was met which was supposed to be 1bn but i can't recall the price? Also does it potentially point a big flaw in their point that the 30% discount was taken
  5. I thought Kraken main man Jesse Powell was pro xrp if not obviously vocally so?
  6. what prices do you see per ripple share on the platforms you can see? On bnktothefuture it appears to be at $61.4 on a few sales in August+ having been between $16 & $30 a go for the previous year or so?
  7. saw an interesting alleged polysign patent on twitter earlier which seemed to involve facial & vocal recognition as some kind of authorisation.....
  8. it's quiet most places & doubt talking like that will get much positive feedback but each to their own
  9. This asset is still amazing to me. Suck it up haters & enjoy your future regrets
  10. I do love her content. A sensible gem in the ocean of hype vids on yt
  11. just saw bob way in a you tube video (90114 - yllop) (1min31sec) so totally not ripple related but wishing everyone a happy 4th of July so good to see him looking well at least
  12. fair enough all that I can agree with. I think he'll turn up working on an xrp project some time but quiet for now which is fine.
  13. all the negative folks looking for the worst conspiracy bollocks. A person who wrote words we liked is doing something else (or something similar or more so they don't want to talk about) & we are supposed to feel like we're owed something? Er nope I don't follow that I'm a princess logic. I'm happy to do my own research & not think the worst just cause someone isn't summarising it for me. I still think the future is bright, you're welcome to disagree with that & call me an optimist or delusional but I'm not crying 'cause an internet identity didn't ask my permission for
  14. that is a huge unknown as I can't recall anyone ever commenting on how much they had in n/v & how much that would normally last (plus if volumes have been lower with covid?) Plus the how traceable will small payments be if/when they return?
  15. Maybe I'm optimistic but it sounds and looks exactly what I would expect removal of n/v accounts to look like. Namely the big customer uses odl for a bit to top up such n/v aka "treasury" payments. Then after proving it works reliably with saving customer decides to apply it to the actual individual payments AFTER they have burned thru their n/v (or reduced to whatever level they are comfortable with) then volumes (if they're as easy to trace in small payments?) will return........ AKA this could be all the things you mention. So suck up that negativity soldier & have a warm gl
  16. is btc secretly tommen baratheon in this analogy?
  17. jesus lots of fud haters here, must mean it's time for a rerun of er whatever season 2017 was. lol
  18. I will still pea myself laughing if this is just how it happens going from topping up n/v accounts to the actual individual payments (where the drop off is the n/v getting used up) as it is the holy land of what Ripple have targeted & we have been seeking for years but here we are all shitting our pants.....
  19. I'll say again how does a happy customer who was using it to top up their nostro/vostro accounts switch to killing the n/v & using it for actual as needed payments on odl? First they have to use up their n/v funds which would in the short term mean a drop in any previously increasing odl use, after n/v used up volumes will return but in smaller individual size. Simples
  20. Much discussion about this following ripples Asheesh Birla's tweet about this yesterday. See "Staying the course in remittances and SME payments" thread in the press section.
  21. I've been thinking about this all day & although it could just be my delusional optimism could it not also just be, as partly touched on above with the Schwartz tweets etc, that this is just switching from large top ups to keep the nostro/vostro's topped up AKA "treasury" & now they trust it works & are happy to use it directly for the smaller individual payments. If we're talking moneygram here then does that cover all the corridors which have now dropped? If the end goal/promise of removing the need for nostro/vostros is or could be happening now how would it be handled
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.