CountZerpula

Hard to say without knowing the specifics, but it sounds like that's what could've happened to you. I know that they've mentioned making changes in dealing with KYC/AML/compliance and I think it will end up a more 'up front/when you set up the account' type of process that would result in less unpleasant 'surprises' in the form of forced compliance checks on an 'as you go' basis. Hope you got sorted out

I like your initial question and premise @brianwalden - my reply is meant in the sense that the system should be dynamic enough whereby it ostensibly requires enough XRP to be locked up at any given time, such that it would allow for scenarios where one agent, or a few agents might act as you mention, and would still be able to compensate the originator. I don't mean to say that all XRP provided by originators would need to be locked up at all times. I could've worded it better so as to be less literal in that way -- and while I recognize that you stipulate 'under normal conditions' you also

In your example the XRP are in fact held on XRPL during the entire life-cycle of the corresponding FXRP, from origination to redemption. https://flare.xyz/app/uploads/2020/08/FXRP_Version_1.0.pdf

made me think of this

Feel free to join the Discord if you like https://discord.gg/ehVRQt3j

Hey @Tako - that was for the closed beta, which has now ended - and some of those instructions changed along the way anyhow, was nothing you were doing wrong. There will be a public beta that's expected to begin soon (I believe mid-February, but don't quote me) ...

It's nobody's favorite, that's for sure ... you're not alone in that sentiment Tough spot for everyone to be in - you for having to sit there and wait to provide information for a compliance check, them for having to do it, and while getting crushed by increased volume and a throng of new members ... at least they remain one of a handful of options for US investors to access XRP. Hope you get sorted out quickly, but I'd expect at least a day before it gets resolved, if we're being honest.

@youngdude

I'm all for it - XRP, LTC, DOGE right out of the gate -- then governance, then let's add more @thinlyspread put together a nice graphic that I think aptly describes the Flare landscape, and helps to express the above sentiment in visual detail Interestingly, Vega also sees the merits of a DOGE/LTC as you can hear them talk about potentially building a DOGE bridge during their recent deep dive. ( 44 min mark ) https://www.twitch.tv/vegacommunity/videos They have an ERC20 bridge, as do many other people. https://medium.co

@Delvin I can tell you that there are a few of us in The Zerpening who are in the test group, and we share our experiences periodically there. It's not been a heavy topic of conversation, but as questions might arise, the conversation shifts that way. There is a LOT of information to digest and understand between Flare & Flare Finance, but I've definitely noticed that people have been leaning into doing their research and diligence - more so than at the end of last year, as an example. As far as my experience with Flare & Flare Finance separately - I've been in each projects' resp

I remember @CryptoEri having suggested that Ripple give back the Tetragon money, though I don't want to overstate or take her sentiment out of context here - but I thought the same thing and I wonder how viable or realistic that scenario might even be, or if it becomes more or less of an option beyond a certain point.

Welcome

@tulo you may find some answers over on Flare Official Discord https://discord.gg/XGFfp2JU