Jump to content

Mbetti

Member
  • Posts

    598
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mbetti

  1. Yeah. It looks like a manipulated Shi* SHOW by Big Traders and Tether.
  2. "I despise people who tell other people to "HODL" as a sign of faith and consider rational de-risking a betrayal or something. " HE IS SAYING: DO NOT LISTEN TO OTHERS. PERIOD. He is not saying you should or your should not hodl. What if he said: Yeah, hold it....and it goes down...again personal attacks. His position is smart and clear....but obviously not clear enough.
  3. That is exactly why xrp will be used. Swift will not stay messaging system in that case. What other reason can it be behind partnership? I cannot think of any
  4. Please show me where SWIFT costs 20 to 40 cents if you are refering to SWIFT ? They cost 25 dollars to transfer 150 usd from Europe to USA
  5. Whatever. Should i let next time the guys on the forum click the link and pay BTC, or you rather have miss-information and still save your money?
  6. Better safe then sorry. Posted it , so Uphold pips know this
  7. UPHOLD has been hacked. This is attack email. It points to attackers btc adress
  8. if we can work with Swift to do that...then that is great
  9. That is what i am implying. Swiftgpi + Ripplenet would be a Win-win scenario. No installement fee for Ripplenet as it is an Api connector ( plugin ir whatever word you want to use/ it is plug and play servuce ) and using existing service. When they try it, they can go to Ripplenet 100% if they are happy with numbers. That is why i am interested in cost Swiftgpi + Ripplenet
  10. Maybe, but then again the MOON-POINT of 2017-2018. of ALL CRYPTOS was insane, totally insane with no real crypto usability in real world. Was it not? The statement that ONE crypto will reach that pricepoint is not insane at all if you look back. So if you look back, what is more insane? History to repeat and exceed the price together with real use cases or that xrp is 1 usd ? At what point the investing in xrp becomes a speculation? First half of 2018. is speculation, End of 2018. in conformation of investment. I think conformation will bring more investitors and less speculation. Investitors tend to HODL. I love your postings @Ripple-Stiltskin , but i do think price will exceed many price-points here. Guess i am an insane-r.
  11. Cool. Still interested in fees Swiftgpi + other Api ( Ripplenet example ) - i believe that pricepoint of using gpi api ( no installment - will benefit both Ripple and Swift ) We allready know what Ripple charges banks their software. In other words: Big players can connect to Xrpaid for smallest fees ever Small players cab get a glymps of Xrapid through the Api with no Ripplenet installment price. @Hodor just a speculation: You know the price of Ripplenet installment. Do you agree that SwiftGpi - instant api connection to Ripplenet would be cheaper in the beginning for smaller banks and slightly bigger fees cause they still need to pay a portion to use swiftgpi ?
  12. You guys speculate on Swift + Ripple cinnection. Do you expect and Older Finance brother Swift to say : We suck, we will just Xrp ourselfs and barry our tech to the ground just to glorify the Ripplenet tech ? It is fairly easy to conclude from tweets and news whats going on and why none of the sides see themselves as threat or why nowbody is saying anything : Swift: We will not use Rippletech Ripple: We will not partner with Swift, but we have api connector SwiftGpi: I opened my Money Settlement Api for other connections . That is a fact. Swift: Swiftgpi is therefore a trendy solution; banks use us, and we have a backdoor for Crypto if banks choose to use it SwiftGpi: Yeah my Fellow Swifty, we did this because we want banks to be ones who connect themselves to Crypto. That way, if something goes wrong with Crypto security or bugs ( because we at Swift are idiots )banks can blame Api connection ( Ripplenet for example, or any other settlement mechanism they choose ). I am not saying rhis will happen, but i can wash my hands from the settlement API. Swift: Yes my fellow Gpi, that way we are involved in Crypto, but it is not our decision; banks decide, we provide! SwiftGpi: And probably because of my Api, the Banks that allready activated GPI will need less money to activate ripplenet at their existing Swift connection then to pay Ripple a price to connect bank only to Xrapid through a contract with Ripple. I think somebody said this is costly. Okay so this sceanario is what i think it is happening. In this case nowbody needs to make statements. Please correct me if i am wrong; but can somebody calculate the: 1. Swiftgpi + ripplenet price 2. Ripplenet xrapid installment In my opinion the transaction fees through : pay swift a bit, pay ripplenet a bit are bigger, and still competitive Fees through ripplenet alone: Bank installment, etc.. much bigger, but transaction fees are minus swiftgpi. Opinions?
  13. Uber wouldn't be a surprice giving the Donation few months back by Ashton Kutcher . One of the main uber investitors
  14. And do not forget that January was no XRAPID timeline. So i conclude that tools we have to explore ledger transactions by xrapid are zero.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.