karlos

Administrator
  • Content count

    1,088
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

karlos last won the day on February 5

karlos had the most liked content!

About karlos

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.xrpchat.com/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Country
  1. My understanding is the Nano allows transactions without the secret key ever leaving the secure chip. If you use a native wallet, the secret key is stored temporarily in the system memory, and also on the usb drive. Say your computer gets hacked, the malware will have easy access to your usb drive. The attacker get a copy of the wallet.dat file from usb, then the key logger simply records your password the next time you use the wallet. With Nano, this is not possible, the chip that holds the secret key is physically separated, even a compromised machine cannot access it.
  2. Why would you want to introduce mining to the RCL?
  3. Hello there thanks for joining!
  4. I know it doesn't have anything to do with Xrp price speculation. Moved topic.
  5. I love it! Thanks to @Hodor and @Tikrp for debating, and @Mercury for setting it up! I can see both sides of the argument, it reminds me of the debate around encryption in the early days. Should we allow the bad guys to encrypt their communications, and if not who will keep government power in check? Now we are asking similar questions about payments, with systems like PathShuffle.
  6. Yeh that is the impression I get too. Running a secure independent validator on a permanent basis is not a trivial task. I guess thats why we haven't seen more public validators.
  7. Thanks Jon, that was a very detailed post. So right now almost all the public validators are either exchanges, or run by Ripple employees. Can you verify a validator without needing to contact Ripple i.e. just using ripple.txt? It would be much better if there was an independent site that handles all the verification. Also I'm confused why people would run their nodes as a validator, but not identify themselves. It means nobody will trust them, and all the validations are pointless?
  8. I like the idea. We used to have a widget with USD/XRP, but the cloud provider kept telling me it was messing up the forum, even though it was cached and everything. I did always want a price ticker..
  9. As mentioned here, we are compiling the FAQs for Ripple with the common concerns/objections. Here are the questions, and my example answers. This is only my small attempt to answer the questions, please write your own! Critique these responses and correct them. I'm sure there any many good points that have not been addressed yet. Make sure you "like" the answers you want to see included in the final guide! I think this will be an invaluable resource for the community. Whenever a newbie has a common question, we can refer them to this guide. The FAQ will be included in the Links & Resources section for easy reference. We will also start promoting the Links & Resources section more prominently for joining members. Once all the best response have been compiled, I will create a new "Page" with the final version. ________________________________________________________ Common questions and concerns about Ripple XRP is pre-mined Using the term "pre-mined" is a bit misleading, as Ripple does not involve mining to secure the network. All the XRP that that can ever exist (100 billion) were already created at inception. Mining is very costly in terms of energy and the environment, and is not very effective at distributing a currency fairly (i.e. due to mining cartels). Ripple owns 60% of all XRP Ripple (the company) currently has custody of the majority of XRP. Having those XRP on hand gives Ripple the advantage of being able to incentivise the network to create growth, liquidity and new markets. Whilst other crypto markets move toward currency centralisation because of mining, the Ripple network is moving in the opposite direction, slowly distributing XRP each month. Once the escrow is completed, Ripple will only hold around six billion XRP (or 6% of the total supply) to use freely (see here) Ripple can sell one billion XRP a month under the lockup Under the terms of the escrow, 55 billion XRP are locked up, with one billion per month available to grow the network. There will be 55 individual lockup contracts of one billion XRP each; each contract will expire on the first day of every month. Whatever hasn't been spent at the end of the month will be put into a new escrow account at the back of the queue. However, this does not mean Ripple intend to sell one billion XRP per month. Currently (and for many years) Ripple has been distributing around 300 million XRP per month. (see here). Ripple has proven after many years it can distribute XRP in a responsible manner. Ripple can make as many XRP as they want (a.k.a printing money) The maximum amount of XRP that can ever exist is 100 billion. This amount is established at the protocol level, and already exists on the ledger today. Soon Ripple will introduce a new amendment that ensures no further XRP can be created, even accidentally (see here). While it is technically possible at this point for Ripple to alter the protocol to create more XRP, once there are enough independent validators this will be impossible. Banks won't use XRP Banks may not yet use XRP, because the laws and regulations have not caught up to digital currencies. However, progress is being made, and already banks have started to hold digital currencies: The role of XRP is that of an intermediary currency, and banks may never need to touch XRP for it to play a part in a successful payment. There are significant cost savings to using XRP for payments, however it remains to be seen if banks will choose this option. Banks are under great pressure to increase profit, and XRP definitely increases profit. Jed wants to crash the price/ suppress the price Jed McCaleb was one of the founders of Ripple, but left the company in 2014. At inception he was allocated 8 billion XRP. After leaving he attempted to dump his XRP on the market, and a court case ensued. The aftermath was a settlement agreement where Jed's XRP were locked up and held in custody by Ripple (see here). The terms of the agreement are: Under the terms of the agreement, Jed is severely restricted from selling his XRP, and has very little impact on the market. The price of XRP also increased from $0.006 to $0.25, strongly suggesting Jed cannot manipulate the market. ILP means lack of focus on XRP / Ripple doesn't care about XRP Ripple has reaffirmed its commitment to XRP many times. They are actively seeking new liquidity partners, adding XRP to exchanges (Bithumb, Coinone etc) and creating incentives for people to use XRP. It is here to stay. Ripple has several employees who are devoted solely to improving the appeal of XRP (such as the Head of XRP markets). Ripple is intentionally keeping XRP stable/low. XRP is better for banks if it has low volatility It is true that market makers and banks would prefer a stable currency. However banks still stand to save money even with high volatility (see here). Also, Ripple has stated on several occasions they do not engage in short term price action. (see here) They hold a large amount of XRP, and it is absolutely in their best interest to see the price go up, rather than suppress it. There's no incentive to run a validator/nobody is going to run them Although the technical requirements to run a validator are low, it is not a trivial task if you want your validator to participate in any meaningful way. Validators need to show a history of accurate and on time validations. They need to be run by independent parties, regularly updated and kept secure. For these reasons, the list of validators is currently low. Also unlike bitcoin nodes, their is no financial incentive to run a validator. However, validators are crucial for keeping the network healthy, and unlike other crypto currencies, only a small amount of validating nodes are required to run the network smoothly. Because the owners of Ripple validators are driven by the desire to help the network and not strictly for financial reward, validators can be drawn from the wide range of industries: financial institutions, government agencies, and educational bodies. Interest in running a validator is increasing increase over time (see here) Ripple can freeze funds using the Freeze feature The Freeze flag is only available for non-XRP balances. If you own XRP, it cannot be frozen. The early ledgers got lost The ledger details before 32,570 were lost due to a bug. As of writing, Ripple has completed over 30 million successful ledger closes. The ledgers lost is under 0.1%, and do not affect the operation of the network moving forward. The founders allocated too much XRP for themselves The initial allocation went like this: At inception, there were 100 billion XRP created. 20 billion XRP were given to the founders (Chris Larsen, Arthur Britto and Jed McCaleb) 80 was given to the company (Ripple Inc) While 20% seems large, it is important to remember that a large portion has been donated to charity. Chris Larsen has committed 7 billion XRP to rippleworks (pledge details here). Jed McCaleb has also committed 2 billion to charity (see here). Assuming the remaining 11 billion is still in the founders possession and not already sold or donated, they currently own 11% of XRP. Of that 11%, a large portion is locked up under the settlement agreement. For comparison, the unknown "Satoshi Nakamoto" is estimated to have around 1 million bitcoins, or around 4.7% of all bitcoins to sell at any time. Ripple controls the only validators that matter In order for the network to become properly decentralised/distributed, it needs to reach a critical mass (see here). Once there are enough independent participants, it will be relatively trivial to extend trust across the network. However it vital that this process is done carefully and after third party validating nodes have been properly attested. Ripple has explained its plan to further decentralise the network (see here).
  10. Another victory for the community and Ripple! Soon XRP is gonna be listed on every exchange, and you'll be able to buy it in Timbuktu
  11. Pretty good observation, I noticed the same. Either the Ripple market cap seems artificially high, or the transaction volume is abnormally low for its size. If we are comparing apples (Bitcoin) to bananas (Ripple), which is probably a bad thing to do. I don't think Ripple exists solely to make banks and themselves rich though. Its clear they want to change payments, which helps everyone not just banks. Stellar wants to empower ordinary people, but to do that you have to upgrade the legacy systems first.
  12. Yep it's the same author posting every few days about Ripple. He brings up the same points, and has no unique research or new interviews.
  13. From today forward, accounts will need to be older than 7 days to post on the zerpbox. New members will still be able to read the chatbox as normal however.
  14. As mentioned here, we are creating a different kind of FAQ for new members. These are objections/concerns which are coming up repeatedly both in the forum and the zerpbox. Instead of explaining the answer to every new member individually, the FAQ will be an easy reference guide you can link to. The first step is to determine which questions need to be answered. Here is the list so far: 1. Ripple is premined 2. Ripple owns 60% of all XRP 3. Ripple can sell 1 billion XRP a month under the lockup 4. Ripple can make as many XRP as they want (AKA Printing money) 5. Banks won't use XRP 6. Jed 7. ILP means lack of focus on XRP 8. Ripple doesn't care about XRP 9. Ripple is intentionally keeping XRP stable/low. XRP is better with low volatility. At this stage, please add the questions you see regularly on the forum. I will open another topic to cover the answers later.